[glue-wg] Call for VOTE: OGF GLUE2 Enumerations procedures and best practices

[Florido Paganelli]

Hi all,

I updated the document wrt comments by Andre Merzky.

Here:

 odt:  http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13260?download=
 pdf:  http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13261?download=

Regards,
Florido


On 2014-06-17 11:23, Andre Merzky wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply!  Comments/replies inlined below.
> 
> Cheers, Andre.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Florido Paganelli
> <florido.paganelli at hep.lu.se> wrote:
>>
>>>   - page 4: 'organization_name' and 'interface_name' are MANDATORY,
>>> but '<organization_name>.<interface_name>' is 'RECOMMENDED'.  Are
>>> there real alternatives to the latter or should that be a 'MUST' ?
>>
>> See previous comment. It also says MANDATORY for NEW names. Maybe I
>> should stress the NEW?
> 
> Ah, I overlooked the 'new'.  The statements are correct then IMHO.
> But yes, emphasizing may make it clearer.
> 
> 
>>>   - page 5: 'org.ogf.glue.* SHOULD be used if there are issues with
>>> domain names..' - I am not sure what that means.  What issues?
>>
>> for example a domain name is bought by somebody else who is alien to the
>> initial project. Or simply the domain name does not exist.
>>
>> I just received a request today with domain names that exist but are
>> totally unrelated to the described services.
>>
>> Listing all the issues would not make sense. Is it a bit clearer now? Do
>> you have better suggestions for rephrasing it?
> 
> Maybe instead 'if there are issues' use something like 'if a domain
> name does not exist or is not applicable'?  Either way though, thanks
> for the clarification, makes sense.
> 
> 
> Thanks, Andre.
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>> Florido
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Navarro, John-Paul F.
>>> <navarro at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>> GLUE WG:
>>>>
>>>> From our last GLUE WG teleconference June 3, 2014:
>>>>> Action 2: GLUE WG to review Florido's revised Enumerations document
>>>>> Action 2: At the next GLUE WG call we will vote on the updated document
>>>>
>>>> We will be taking a formal vote tomorrow, June 17, to accept the "OGF GLUE2 Enumerations procedures and best practices" as our practice.
>>>>
>>>> Please review the document here:
>>>>  odt: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13260?download=
>>>>  pdf: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13261?download=
>>>>
>>>> If you have opinion on this best practices document please reply with:
>>>>
>>>> APPROVE - if you support this best practice
>>>> DISAPPROVE - if you object, please clearly summarize your objections so that we can discuss them
>>>>
>>>> If you approve but have suggested please reply with your approval and list your suggestions.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> JP
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> glue-wg mailing list
>>>> glue-wg at ogf.org
>>>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ==================================================
>>  Florido Paganelli
>>    ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration
>>    System Administrator
>>  Lund University
>>  Department of Physics
>>  Division of Particle Physics
>>  BOX118
>>  221 00 Lund
>>  Office Location: Fysikum, Hus B, Rum B313
>>  Office Tel: 046-2220272
>>  Email: florido.paganelli at REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se
>>  Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli
>> ==================================================
>> _______________________________________________
>> glue-wg mailing list
>> glue-wg at ogf.org
>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
> 
> 
> 


-- 
==================================================
 Florido Paganelli
   ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration
   System Administrator
 Lund University
 Department of Physics
 Division of Particle Physics
 BOX118
 221 00 Lund
 Office Location: Fysikum, Hus B, Rum B313
 Office Tel: 046-2220272
 Email: florido.paganelli at REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se
 Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli
==================================================