[glue-wg] VOTE by 8/1: GLUE 2.1 for describing cloud resources?

[Salvatore Pinto]

Hi all,
I obliviously vote for #2 too, with the constraints specified by both 
David and Stephen.

Seeing the replies from the list, I suppose that the decision is to go 
for GLUE 2.1 . If so, I think the next steps would be these:

  1. Update the latest 2.1 draft with track changes and including H2020 
projects requirements (eg. representing cost associated to cloud 
services and additional policy-related info)
  2. Request to the mailing list for collecting non disruptive changes 
to the document (eg. fixing of typos, including references to open 
enumeration procedure document)
  3. Produce a draft update of the JSON, XSD & LDAP schema (check if it 
is needed to update SQL too), to be released together with the draft 2.1

Please, let me know your opinion about these next steps (especially if I 
am missing something).

Cheers,
   Salvatore.

On 29/07/2014 10:18, david.meredith at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would be in favour of adding new 2.1 cloud entities provided:
>
> *	2.1 only adds new (cloud) implementations that are derived from the 2.0 abstract entities.
> *	There are no changes to the 2.0 entities, especially no changes to the core abstract entities.
>
> This is important for the XSD rendering (and other renderings too I imagine). For an XSD rendering, the new cloud entities would be defined using a new namespace defined in a separate XSD. The new cloud entities would need to extend the existing abstract BaseTypes defined by the 2.0 element inheritance mechanism.  An XML instance doc would still use the existing 2.0 '<GLUE2>' root element, and would import the new cloud entities to be nested under '<GLUE2>' using the existing SubstitutionGroup mechanism.  When validating an instance doc, both the 2.0 XSD and 2.1 cloud extensions XSD would be needed for validation (quite normal).
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: JP Navarro [mailto:navarro at mcs.anl.gov]
>> Sent: 23 July 2014 16:36
>> To: OGF GLUE Working Group
>> Subject: [glue-wg] VOTE by 8/1: GLUE 2.1 for describing cloud resources?
>>
>> GLUE Working Group:
>>
>> We have been discussing two options for using the GLUE schema to describe
>> cloud services.  You may review these options here:
>> - http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13294?download=
>>
>> By August 1, please vote for one of the following options:
>>
>> 1) Use GLUE 2.0 with a Community Practice Profile that details how to describe
>> cloud infrastructure using the existing 2.0 entities
>> 2) Develop GLUE 2.1 adding new Cloud Computing entities (would be 100%
>> backward compatible with GLUE 2.0 for non-Cloud entities)
>>
>> For reference, a preliminary GLUE 2.1 Specification is available here:
>> - http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/2014-January/001527.html
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> JP
>> _______________________________________________
>> glue-wg mailing list
>> glue-wg at ogf.org
>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg


-- 
Salvatore Pinto
Cloud Technologist, EGI.eu
e-mail: salvatore.pinto at egi.eu
skype: salvatore.pinto0
Science Park 140, Amsterdam, The Netherlands