[glue-wg] Enumerations for DPM and related InterfaceNames was: Re: New Endpoint and Service types

[stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk]

Maarten Litmaath [mailto:Maarten.Litmaath at cern.ch] said:
> I suspect using capabilities would be better indeed, but there exists
> plenty of legacy usage that selects on ServiceType.  For example,
> an SE supporting the SRM protocol should publish a record with
> GlueServiceType=SRM, while _GlueSEImplementationName_ may be "DPM".

The GLUE 1 ServiceType maps to the GLUE 2 EndpointInterfaceName, not the GLUE 2 ServiceType! So in GLUE 2 the *Endpoints* should still have a ImplementationName of SRM, but the ServiceType is new and hence open to definition.

Stephen
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.