[glue-wg] Some doubts

[Sergio Andreozzi]

Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>> also here... I think Riccardo is right. The association from 
>> StorageShare to DataStore should be changed from StorageShare to 
>> StorageResource...
>> alternatively, we can add in parallel if people really want 
>> to discover the type of data store on which a storage share is
>>     
> configured.
>
> I think we should keep the Share - Datastore relation as you can't
> deduce it in general if you only have Share - Resource. Maybe we could
> add a Share - Resource relation as well - but do we need it explicitly
> in the model if it's implied by the existing relations?
>   
in the current modeling, it cannot be implied because storageResource is 
associated to a dataStore via a many-to-many relationship.

It would have been possible in this case: storageResource 1--* dataStore


Cheers, Sergio