[glue-wg] Datastore proposal
Sergio Andreozzi
sergio.andreozzi at cnaf.infn.it
Wed Apr 9 19:42:42 CDT 2008
Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
> glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org
>
>> [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Andreozzi said:
>> would this be 1-to-1 between DataStore and Capacity?
>>
>
> I'm inclined to say yes, the definition implies that the storage is
> homogeneous. I'm slightly wondering about Offline storage, i.e. where
> tapes are removed from the robot; my inclination would be to regard that
> as a separate Datastore, but possibly someone can think of a reason why
> not ... of course the people who think that publishing the capacity for
> Nearline storage is a bad idea will presumably think that Offline would
> be even more crazy, so it may well not matter in practice :)
>
in this case, given a dataStore, I would not have define a separate
class for the size attributes. They can be directly added to the
dataStore class.
Sergio
> Stephen
>
--
Sergio Andreozzi
INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860
Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746
40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi
More information about the glue-wg
mailing list