[glue-wg] Datastore proposal

[Sergio Andreozzi]

Hi Stephen,

Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>   The Datastore would have fairly few attributes:
>
> UniqueID (as usual)
>
> Name (human-readable name, maybe indicating the technology, e.g.
> StorageTek)
>  
> Type (disk, tape, ... - open enumeration)
>
> Capacity (NB this is in the schema as a separate object for technical
> reasons but is really just an attribute)
>   

would this be 1-to-1 between DataStore and Capacity?


- Sergio
>   The relation to StorageEnvironment and/or StorageShare remains open
> for discussion as there are other issues there (e.g. whether we want the
> Environment at all), but conceptually you would want a relation between
> the Share and whichever DataStore(s) store the data for that Share. That
> can be one to many, e.g. if Custodial/Online uses disk+tape, as in WLCG.
>