[glue-wg] Rough Draft of the Glue Use Cases Document

[Gerson Galang]

Hi Laurence,

Yes, 5.1 will do.

Thanks,
Gerson

On 6/21/07, Laurence Field <Laurence.Field at cern.ch> wrote:
>
> Hi  Gerson,
>
> This use case seems to be 5.1, "Find all the service endpoints for a
> specific service type."
> In your particular case the instance is the compute service. The
> requirement is that this should take into consideration multiple
> resources.
>
> Is that acceptable?
>
> Laurence
>
>
> Gerson Galang wrote:
> > Hi Laurence,
> >
> > Here's the same use case coming from the user's perspective.
> >
> > Description: Find the compute service for the compute resource
> > Actors: End Users
> > Conversation: What is the URI of the GRAM service that I can submit my
> > job to if I want to run my job on this cluster?
> >
> > We need to be careful in implementing this requirement because we
> > wouldn't want to put any restrictions on the computing service that it
> > can only submit to one compute resource. The only reason why this
> > requirement got added to the UseCases wiki page is because of the
> > issue we had with the draft UML diagram of the new GLUE2.0 entities.
> > We didn't have any problems with how GLUE1.2 and 1.3 implemented this
> > because the Cluster entity supported this through the ContactString
> > attribute.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gerson
> >
> > On 6/20/07, *Laurence Field* <Laurence.Field at cern.ch
> > <mailto:Laurence.Field at cern.ch>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Gerson,
> >
> >     I had a little difficulty understanding how this fits as a use case
> as
> >     it seems to be the wrong way wound. The system administrator
> >     wanting to
> >     advertise a specific set-up is a requirement on a use case,  what
> the
> >     the end user does with the information that is advertised is the use
> >     case. Please can you let me know what use case this is a
> >     requirement for
> >     or alternatively, suggest a new use case written from the
> >     perspective of
> >     then information consumer.
> >
> >     Thanks
> >
> >     Laurence
> >
> >     Gerson Galang wrote:
> >     > Hi Laurence,
> >     >
> >     > Can you tell me which section you've inserted use case 32 in the
> >     > document you sent?
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/UseCases
> >     > <
> >
> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/UseCases>
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > Gerson
> >     >
> >     > On 6/19/07, *Laurence Field* <Laurence.Field at cern.ch
> >     <mailto:Laurence.Field at cern.ch>
> >     > <mailto:Laurence.Field at cern.ch <mailto:Laurence.Field at cern.ch>>>
> >     wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Hi All,
> >     >
> >     >     I have uploaded the first rough draft of the Glue Use Cases
> >     Document.
> >     >
> >     >     http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc14621?nav=1
> >     >
> >     >     Please let me know if you have any general comments on the
> >     >     structure of
> >     >     the document or if there are any important use cases that are
> >     >     mising. We
> >     >     will be going through the use cases at the next meeing.
> >     >
> >     >     Thanks
> >     >
> >     >     Laurence
> >     >
> >     >     _______________________________________________
> >     >     glue-wg mailing list
> >     >     glue-wg at ogf.org <mailto:glue-wg at ogf.org>
> >     <mailto:glue-wg at ogf.org <mailto:glue-wg at ogf.org>>
> >     >     http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/attachments/20070622/03e33ee0/attachment.htm