[glue-wg] FW: [bug #20804] GlueCEInfoContactString should be a real URL

[Gabriele Garzoglio]

Hi,
I don't think that we are very resilient to any changes, at this point, 
but we have to take a decision. By the way, is the lcg broker going to 
distinguish the new attribute value and not crash?

glitece:// seams appropriate to me.

Cheers
Gabriele

Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> I seem to have lost track of this ... we still need to say what the 
> (pseudo-)URL should be for the glite CE. Something like 
> glitece://host.name/blah-pbs? We need a scheme name which isn't going 
> to clash with anything else, and offhand I can't think of anything 
> better - the interface is actually condor-C but that might be needed 
> for other things.
>  
> Stephen
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org]
>     *On Behalf Of *Gabriele Garzoglio
>     *Sent:* 28 March 2007 17:03
>     *To:* Burke, S (Stephen)
>     *Cc:* glue-wg at ogf.org
>     *Subject:* Re: [glue-wg] FW: [bug #20804] GlueCEInfoContactString
>     should be a real URL
>
>     Hi,
>     having a URL for each different syntax is probably a good approach.
>     Cheers
>     Gabriele
>
>     Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>>     Gabriele Garzoglio [mailto:garzogli at fnal.gov] said:
>>       
>>>     I would like for the GlueCEInfoContactString to be the 
>>>     GRAM-URL for the resource.
>>>         
>>
>>     For the LCG CE that's OK, but the glite CE doesn't have a gram interface
>>     (apart from fork on the CE headnode). We can either invent a URL for
>>     that or leave it unset. In the future it's possible that some glite CEs
>>     will have gram as well, but at the moment it isn't supported.
>>
>>     Stephen
>>       
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/attachments/20070404/01a63470/attachment.html