[gin] Slides for panel

[Erwin Laure]

Hi Oscar, 

Sorry - of course security is part of the discussion; I've just missed
adding the last slide!
It is there now. 

Cheers, 

-- Erwin
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oscar Koeroo [mailto:okoeroo at nikhef.nl] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:13 AM
> To: Erwin Laure
> Cc: gin at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [gin] Slides for panel
> 
> Hi Erwin,
> 
> 
> What I miss and hope to be discussed are the various chosen 
> security models in each of the example services. Maybe this 
> is a too production directed approach, but surely something 
> to be discussed. :-)
> 
> Writing pieces of software that glue the various 
> implementations is something that would be solved by 
> interpreting the meaning of the passed messages and adapting 
> that to your own software.
> 
> But the underlaying protocols are then not address. Do you 
> use a form of delegation, is that required/supported or out 
> of the question. Is it fully based on web-services or is that 
> non-applicable. These details could also be more streamlined.
> 
> Also the bases on which you authenticate and authorize the 
> users and their respected group affiliations is something 
> that has various different approaches. There are convergence 
> to VOMS and Shibboleth (as what I can see) in my perspective.
> 
> 
> 
> More flexibility/translations/tolerance and understanding in 
> the protocols and how they are used in the various services 
> will greatly clarify and ease the interoperability between 
> the various Grid environments.
> 
> 
> cheers,
> 
> 	Oscar
> 
> 
> 
> Erwin Laure wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Based on our discussion yesterday I've produced a set of 
> slides that 
> > should help steer the discussion on Thursday:
> > http://www.ogf.org/OGF21/materials/1018/GIN-Panel.ppt
> > 
> > Comments and further input highly welcome. 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > -- Erwin
> > --
> >   gin mailing list
> >   gin at ogf.org
> >   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/gin
> 
>