[gin-data] Re: progress...

[Gregor von Laszewski]

Erwin:

	we have tested our tool and it works as expected. However, there is  
some issue in regards to renewing accounts and alloctaions on TG to  
run this that are not yet resolved. To no longer delay the  
publication of the data, we have involved Raj that will start the  
program for us on the TG. We hope this takes place tomorrow. This  
also allows us to test the "easy deploy" requirement of the systems  
so it could be replicated on other systems. Mike is improving the  
documentation to make this happening.

In return we have one question that we issued to this mailinglist  
before:

On which other Grids should we test our software?
Is there someone in the GIN working group that can let us know which  
Grids we should approach next? From the experience we had with  
obtaining accouts, it looks like we want to get this established  
ASAP. in order to start the application program. We probably need  
some kind of "sponsor" or "champion" to push this out on the other  
Grids. So if there are people from other Grids (other than TG) in  
this working group, maybe you can let us know how we should approach  
getting accounts on your Grids.

I would assume this applies also to the other technologies from the  
GIN-WG, do you have a uniform project description that I can point  
other Grids to as part of the application process?

Gregor


On Jul 25, 2006, at 4:39 AM, Erwin Laure wrote:

> Hi,
>
> GGF18 is coming up soon. Could we please get an update on the  
> interop tests of SRB, SRM, and gridFTP?
>
> We will use this information to make an interop matrix available on  
> the GIN gridforge pages.
>
> Also, we should prepare instructions of how people can run these  
> tests themselves, i.e. test, whether their infrastructure is  
> interoperable with others.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Erwin
>