[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Java binding : package naming

[erwindl0]

Great, thanks Peter.

org.drmaa is a perfect solution indeed.

cheers
erwin

Op 06/07/2016 om 10:44 schreef Peter Tröger:
> Hello,
>
>> 1. Is it an option to change the expected Java package name to e.g. org.ogf.drmaa ?
>> Potentially e.g. for DRMAA v2 as it would seem that there are no known Java binding implementations yet?
>> (and then we live with the temporary risk for DRMAA v1 until everyone has switched to v2)
> There is nothing like a „change“, because their is no standard (see my last mail). So renaming is fine from my perspective.
>
>> 2. Is the OGF or DRMAA group able to have a long-term "claim" on the namespace org.ggf somehow?
> I have a lot of faith in the current OGF leaders, but re-orgs simply happen. GGF is history, so the domain is most likely to be gone forever. The same may happen to the OGF brand in the future.
>
> I would propose to simply use the „drmaa.org“ domain for the package namespace. We are owning and maintaining it for 14 years now, which hopefully shows the groups long-term commitment to keep it up and running in the future.
>
> Best regards,
> Peter.
>
>> 3. Or is this simply not considered a risk/issue in your community and is your advice to just go ahead with org.ggf.drmaa?
>>
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> erwin
>>
>> [1] https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.triquetrum
>> [2] https://www.osgi.org/
>> [3]  http://science.eclipse.org/
>>
>>
>> --
>>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>>   https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg