[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Java[TM] Language Binding Specification 1.0.1

[Daniel Templeton]

The fact that multiple DRM systems already implement 1.0 and call it 1.0?

Daniel

Rajic, Hrabri wrote:
> Given that we have not submitted DRMAA Java bindings to OGF yet, there
> should not be a problem calling this version 1.0 to have 1:1 mapping
> with IDL doc.
>
> The document history could be captured in the document itself, so the
> previous readers do not get utterly confused.
>
> What are the obstacles for the above proposal?
>
> Hrabri
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: drmaa-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:drmaa-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
>>     
> Behalf
>   
>> Of Daniel Templeton
>> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:13 PM
>> To: DRMAA Working Group
>> Subject: [DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Java[TM] Language Binding Specification 1.0.1
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Attached is the 1.0.1 version of the specification.  (Per my last
>>     
> email,
>   
>> the version number may change.)  The only change from 1.0 is the
>> deprecation of the getJobProgramStatus() method in favor of
>> getJobStatus() to reflect a similar change in the final IDL binding
>>     
> spec.
>   
>> Daniel
>>     
> --
>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>