[DRMAA-WG] [SAGA-RG] drmaa public comments

[Andre Merzky]

Hi Hrabri, DRMAAs, 

Gregory Newby put the errata proposal online by now, its
linked on the front page of the editor project.  Direkt
link:

  http://forge.ogf.org/short/ggf-editor/errata

Again, that document is in draft state.  Feedback is
probably welcome in any stage, but public comment will 
open sometime next week (I think).

Cheers,

  Andre.


Quoting [Hrabri Rajic] (May 02 2007):
> Subject: RE: [SAGA-RG] drmaa public comments
> From:    "Rajic, Hrabri" <hrabri.rajic at intel.com>
> To:      Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> 
> Hi Andre,
> 
> --- Following up on your replay ---
> 
> I am not sure if its relevant to the discussion, but anyway:
> 
> the GFSG is in the process of discussing an errata process.
> That should enter public comment around OGF20.  That process
> does not cover how to coordinate implementation versions,
> but should allow you to manage errata lists in a fairly
> lightweight process.
> 
> The process is not yet agreed upon, but I probably can post
> the draft if there is interest.
> ---  end of replay ------
> 
> 
> My mail is kind of messed up, but I have seen your post via DRMAA-WG
> e-mail archive.
> 
> Yes, please post the draft regarding the errata process.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 	Hrabri
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>> Subject: [SAGA-RG] drmaa public comments
>> From:    saga-rg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:saga-rg-bounces at ogf.org]
>>          On Behalf Of Andre Merzky
>> To:      SAGA RG
>> 
>> You may want to have a look at the DRMAA mailing list
>> archive from this month:
>> 
>>   http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/2007-May/thread.html
>> 
>> The DRMAA group got a number of comments in respect to their
>> interop document (I believe), which raise several issues
>> which are also interesting for SAGA.  In general, SAGA seems
>> already to address all of these issues.  Nice :-)
>> 
>> Cheers, Andre.
>> 



-- 
"XML is like violence: if it does not help, use more."