[drmaa-wg] DRMAA for Torque

[Rajic, Hrabri]

DRMAA_ERRNO_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE error code is not in the language
independent spec.  There might be other auxiliary things only in the C
binding doc like this constant to complement the spec. 

It is a good thing that these extras are unofficially supported
universally.

Do we want to document them in the experience docs?

Regards

	Hrabri


>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-drmaa-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-drmaa-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf
Of
>Daniel Templeton
>Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 10:19 AM
>To: DRMAA Working Group
>Cc: Matthieu Cargnelli
>Subject: Re: [drmaa-wg] DRMAA for Torque
>
>Peter,
>
>I figured out what's wrong.  The error is not in the list of errors at
>the end of the doc, but it is in the return code list for the
individual
>functions.
>
>Daniel
>
>Peter Troeger wrote On 02/07/06 08:20,:
>
>>The current DRMAA release in Condor 6.7.16 contains the problem, it
>>will be fixed with the next release.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Peter.
>>
>>Am 06.02.2006 um 15:29 schrieb Daniel Templeton:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for pointing that out.  I'll file an issue against SGE, and
add
>>>the missing error code.
>>>
>>>Daniel
>>>
>>>Peter Troeger wrote On 02/04/06 21:46,:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Am 04.02.2006 um 21:26 schrieb Peter Troeger:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Meanwhile I'm surprised by something: in the ST_SUPPORTED_ATTR
>>>>>>test the
>>>>>>program checks the drmaa_get_next_attr_name() return code,
>>>>>>comparing it
>>>>>>with DRMAA_ERRNO_SUCCESS and then with
>>>>>>DRMAA_ERRNO_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE. If the return code is
>>>>>>neither of
>>>>>>these values, the test fails. I understood that the
>>>>>>drmaa_get_next_attr_name() function was supposed to return
>>>>>>DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_MORE_ELEMENTS when the end of the list is reached.
>>>>>>That's
>>>>>>what my lib does, and the therefore the test fails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where am I wrong ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>Nowhere. I will fix this immediately. The more interesting question
>>>>>is while earlier tests with other implementations didn't brought
>>>>>that up (Dan, Andreas ?).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Ok, I found it. The C-binding spec 1.0 introduced
>>>>DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_MORE_ELEMENTS as new error code (see also tracker
>>>>issue #1173). SGE, Condor and the current test suite where mainly
>>>>implemented according to C-binding v0.95, so this is a historical
>>>>bug.
>>>>
>>>>Peter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Thanks !
>>>>>
>>>>>Peter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks for the help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Matthieu Cargnelli
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>***************************************************
>>>*        Daniel Templeton   UMPK18 x83749         *
>>>*       Staff Engineer, Sun N1 Grid Engine        *
>>>***************************************************
>>>*   An "intellectual" is a man who takes more     *
>>>* words than he needs to say more than he knows.  *
>>>*                       -Dwight D. Eisenhower     *
>>>***************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>***************************************************
>*        Daniel Templeton   UMPK18 x83749         *
>*       Staff Engineer, Sun N1 Grid Engine        *
>***************************************************
>*   An "intellectual" is a man who takes more     *
>* words than he needs to say more than he knows.  *
>*                       -Dwight D. Eisenhower     *
>***************************************************