[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA conformance rules
Daniel Templeton
Dan.Templeton at Sun.COM
Fri Dec 22 11:23:24 CST 2006
Peter,
Some edits:
A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its
document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
from this document are addressed in the language binding. An
implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming language
and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if the API implementation
and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language binding document, or
to this document. In case of conflicts, the language-specific binding
specification has precedence.
Did you want to mention the compatibility tests for certain languages?
Daniel
Peter Troeger wrote:
> Some updated version:
>
> A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its
> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
> from this document are considered in the language binding. An
> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming language
> and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if the API implementation
> and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language binding document, or
> this document. In case of conflicts, the language-specific binding
> specification has precedence.
>
> It now provides a clearer definition of 'conformance'.
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> Am 22.12.2006 um 10:27 schrieb Peter Troeger:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got a comment for the IDL spec that we do not have a clear
>> declaration of "conformance". Therefore, here is my suggestion for
>> some text block in the IDL spec:
>>
>> -- snip
>>
>> A language binding document is allowed to use “DRMAA 1.0” in its
>> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
>> from this document are considered in the language binding. An
>> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming language
>> and DRM system can be called “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if (A) the API
>> implementation and behavior confirms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language
>> binding document, or this document. In case of conflicts, the
>> language-specific binding specification has precedence.
>>
>> -- snip
>>
>> What do you think ?
>> Peter.
>> --
>> drmaa-wg mailing list
>> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>>
>
> --
> drmaa-wg mailing list
> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>
More information about the drmaa-wg
mailing list