[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA conformance rules

[Peter Troeger]

Some updated version:

A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its  
document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions  
from this document are considered in the language binding. An  
implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming language  
and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if the API implementation  
and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language binding document, or  
this document. In case of conflicts, the language-specific binding  
specification has precedence.

It now provides a clearer definition of 'conformance'.

Peter.



Am 22.12.2006 um 10:27 schrieb Peter Troeger:

> Hi,
>
> I got a comment for the IDL spec that we do not have a clear
> declaration of "conformance". Therefore, here is my suggestion for
> some text block in the IDL spec:
>
> -- snip
>
> A language binding document is allowed to use “DRMAA 1.0” in its
> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
> from this document are considered in the language binding. An
> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming language
> and DRM system can be called “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if (A) the API
> implementation and behavior confirms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language
> binding document, or this document. In case of conflicts, the
> language-specific binding specification has precedence.
>
> -- snip
>
> What do you think ?
> Peter.
> --
>   drmaa-wg mailing list
>   drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg