[drmaa-wg] Re: [torqueusers] Torque Licence

[Rajic, Hrabri]

Good question.   I have no idea what it takes to install Wiki [on
www.drmaa.org] or if it is possible to do so.  Drama.org has good admin
tools.

Any recommendations for a particular Wiki to install or experience in
doing Wiki installations?

Hrabri

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-drmaa-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-drmaa-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf
Of
>Peter Troeger
>Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:25 AM
>To: Daniel Templeton
>Cc: Rayson Ho; drmaa-wg at gridforum.org
>Subject: Re: [drmaa-wg] Re: [torqueusers] Torque Licence
>
>
>>A little while back, I went through the JNI code for the Java language
>>binding, and removed all of the SGE-dependent pieces.  It should now
be
>>in a state where the SGE Java language binding can be used on top of
any
>>DRM with a DRMAA C binding.
>>
>>More to the point, I'm pretty sure that Peter is planning to integrate
>>the SGE Java language with his Condor C binding.  Peter, is this true?
>>
>>
>
>You are right, this will be the next step after reaching a stable state
>for the Condor DRMAA C library. It would be could if you could maintain
>a stable link to the latest implementation - clicking around in th SGE
>web pages in no fun. If we want to use DRMAA.ORG for such issues, we
>should ask Hrabri for a Wiki installation. I could also offer free
>hosting space on my own machines.
>
>Regards,
>Peter.
>
>>Daniel
>>
>>Rayson Ho wrote On 10/13/05 17:30,:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Please do not use GPL as anything linking against your library will
>>>also need to be GPL licensed.
>>>
>>>If your DRMAA library only calls the PBS native API, then I guess it
>>>should be OK to use LGPL, since it is relatively independent of the
>>>Torque source tree anyway.
>>>
>>>BTW, can you work with Daniel?  We will be (AFAIK) using the same
Java
>>>binding for GridEngine and Condor.
>>>
>>>Rayson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 10/12/05, Guillaume ALLEON <guillaume.alleon at laposte.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>We are about to release a DRMAA binding to Torque. Our primary
interest
>>>>would be to  use
>>>>a LGPL or GPL Licence but I must admit that I don't know if this is
>>>>compatible with the Torque
>>>>licence. I did not find any licence related to Torque in the
>>>>distribution only the OpenPBS licence
>>>>for which I don't know if point 6 applies.
>>>>
>>>>As well we are using with a slight modification the Java binding
from
>>>>SUN SGE.  Is there any
>>>>known problem ?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Guillaume
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>torqueusers mailing list
>>>>torqueusers at supercluster.org
>>>>http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>