[drmaa-wg] Session Required?

[Andreas Haas]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Daniel Templeton wrote:

> I'm in the job template section of the C binding now, and I noticed that
> none of the functions there return DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_ACTIVE_SESSION.  Is
> that intentional?  If so, I need to fix the Java language binding spec.

I believe it is not intensional.

With C binding in mind one one could argue it is unlikely a session
is needed before those functions can be used. But Java binding clearly
indicates those C functions must be allowed to return
DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_ACTIVE_SESSION.

Regards,
Andreas