[DFDL-WG] Errata doc updated with draft errata 5.39 to 5.59 - from all Trackers

[Mike Beckerle]

This is excellent. Thanks Steve.

I will accept all tracked changes in the errata document, and then edit
them according to your suggestions with change tracking on again so you can
see easily what I've done to fix them.

I'll push this as an updated revision to the redmine repo for a second pass
of review, and let you know.

A couple of these errata may require discussion on our call, but most of it
is straightforward corrections/improvements.

...mikeb

Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
<http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>



On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:22 AM Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Mike
>
> Comments added. I used LibreOffice I'm ok using this for adding comments
> to small docs but not to the spec itself.
>
>
>
> I've* indicated below* and via email to you where significant comments
> apply.
>
> Regards
>
> Steve Hanson
>
> IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
> Architect, *IBM DFDL*
> <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/se-dfdl/index.html>
> Co-Chair, *OGF DFDL Working Group* <http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/>
> *smh at uk.ibm.com* <smh at uk.ibm.com>
> tel:+44-1962-815848
> mob:+44-7717-378890
> Note: I work Tuesday to Friday
>
>
>
> From:        Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
> To:        DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
> Date:        14/10/2019 19:58
> Subject:        [EXTERNAL] [DFDL-WG] Errata doc updated with draft errata
> 5.39 to 5.59 - from        all Trackers
> Sent by:        "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I have updated our document gwde-dfdl-experience-4-v0.9.docx (The Errata
> doc) with draft errata for all known issues that had trackers. This adds
> Errata 5.39 to 5.59.
>
> This is mostly just copying language that was in the trackers into the
> Errata document, but in some cases language had to be consolidated across
> the original tracker description and subsequent update comments. In some
> cases I had to compose descriptive language.
>
> 5.41 is not complete, as it involves review of all occurrences of MUST,
> MUST NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, etc. throughout the document. I plan to
> handle this after all other errata are incorporated into the spec, with a
> single sweep, then people can review by looking for those keywords.
>
> In reviewing these errata, I suggest they are bucketed into those that are
> not controversial, and are best reviewed by editing them into the
> specification, and reviewing there, versus those where there is more
> concern as to whether the described change is correct and complete.
>
> The list of these new errata is below. They are not controversial (to me)
> except where noted.
>
> *5.39*
> 5.40
> 5.41 - one identified change not controvercial. The sweeping pass to
> examine all MUST/SHOULD, etc. is separate.
> 5.42
> *5.43*
> 5.44 - needs careful review
> *5.45 - needs careful review*
> *5.46 - new language - needs review. It is a lengthy discussion. Perhaps
> can be made shorter ? *
> 5.47 - needs careful review
> 5.48 - do we need all 3 overloads of fn:error()? - also, all behavior here
> is very implementation-dependent.
> 5.49
> 5.50
> 5.51
> 5.52
> 5.53
> 5.54
> 5.55
> *5.56*
> 5.57
> 5.58
> 5.59 - needs careful review - description may not match desired/actual
> behavior of implemetations
>
> Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
> *www.tresys.com* <http://www.tresys.com>
> Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
> subject to the *OGF Intellectual Property Policy*
> <http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>
> --
>  dfdl-wg mailing list
>  dfdl-wg at ogf.org
>  https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20191016/5f6c253e/attachment.html>