[DFDL-WG] posted draft r21 and bit-order-features 3.1

[Mike Beckerle]

I have added your changes to spec version r21 into r22 that I am preparing.

The changes to the bit order document are bigger, so I have posted v3.2 of
it which addresses your comments on it. (on redmine)

I have shortened the "Additional Suggested DFDL Features to Simplify
Modeling of MIL-STD-2045" memo (on redmine) to incorporates simplifications
(actually to remove some suggested needs) and incorporate the
stop-indicator approach (all from email: Review of draft-gwdi-mil-std-2
045-additional-features email of July 28.)

....mikeb

Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
<http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>



On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Steve Hanson <smh at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Erratum raised for the byteOrder changes, and a new revision of
> draft-gwde-dfdl-experience-1 created and posted.
>
> Several minor editorial changes made to spec draft r21, please merge in.
>  The ToC needs regenerating (or editing) as the removal of bit order from
> the new appendix has shuffled things up slightly.
>
> Re-reviewed bit order document, added some new comments primarily
> concerned with making sure that other parts of the spec are updated where
> necessary (search for 2014-08-06). I think we are close, but would
> appreciate other WG members reviewing also.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Steve Hanson
> Architect, *IBM DFDL*
> <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/se-dfdl/index.html>
> Co-Chair, *OGF DFDL Working Group* <http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/>
> IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
> *smh at uk.ibm.com* <smh at uk.ibm.com>
> tel:+44-1962-815848
>
>
>
> From:        Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>
> To:        "dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>,
> Date:        04/08/2014 16:39
> Subject:        [DFDL-WG] posted draft r21 and bit-order-features 3.1
> Sent by:        dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> I've posted revised draft of the spec r21 (has changes to DFDL Standard
> Character sets per call today)
>
> I also made corrections to dfdl:byteOrder - added missing binary booleans
> as one of the things byteOrder applies to, and removed sequence, choice,
> group from things that can carry the byteOrder property. Having done these
> fixes I realized this probably requires an erratum actually.
>
> r21 is at *http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13318*
> <http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13318>
>
> I've posted bit-order-features 3.1.  This is
> *http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13317*
> <http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13317>
>
> Language revised to make bitOrder more primitive than byteOrder - applies
> to all grammar regions. Also added implicit-aligning to byte boundary on a
> bit-order change.
>
>
> Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
> *www.tresys.com* <http://www.tresys.com/>
> Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
> subject to the *OGF Intellectual Property Policy*
> <http://www.ogf.org/About/abt_policies.php>
> --
>  dfdl-wg mailing list
>  dfdl-wg at ogf.org
>  https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20140818/0d69e579/attachment.html>