[DFDL-WG] clarification on when escape characters are needed
Garriss Jr., James P.
jgarriss at mitre.org
Wed Jun 19 09:01:43 EDT 2013
This origin of this issue is the Content-Type header in email, where the parameters can be quoted, but sometimes are not:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=”UTF-8”
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
This was not a big deal until I ran into a parameter that included an = in the value:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_150709_149622714.1370937621731"
When confronted with this issue, I was told:
>> there's a pretty simple
>> fix: specify an escape scheme that says that anything inside quotes is
>> not a delimiter. And fortunately your DefaultProperties.xsd file
>> actually comes an escape scheme that does exactly that.
>>
>> So all you have to do is add this:
>>
>> dfdl:escapeSchemeRef="DefaultPropertiesEscapeScheme"
>>
>> to this:
>>
>> <xsd:element name="value" type="xsd:string" />
>>
You may well recognize this scheme, as it’s yours:
<dfdl:defineEscapeScheme name="DefaultPropertiesEscapeScheme">
<dfdl:escapeScheme escapeBlockEnd=""" escapeBlockStart="""
escapeCharacter=""" escapeEscapeCharacter=""" escapeKind="escapeBlock"
extraEscapedCharacters=", %#x0D; %#x0A;" generateEscapeBlock="whenNeeded"
> </dfdl:escapeScheme>
</dfdl:defineEscapeScheme>
I used this solution for the parameters of the Content-Type header, which are key/value pairs.
<xsd:sequence dfdl:separator="=">
<!-- this init is a workaround for Daffodil 0.10 bug (see ContentType element above) -->
<xsd:element name="key" dfdl:initiator="%WSP*;">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/dfdl-1.0/">
<dfdl:assert test="{ dfdl:checkConstraints(.) }" message="The parameter key must match one of the values on the enumerated list."/>
</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="charset"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="name"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="boundary"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<!-- Daffodil 0.10.1 fails here if there's an = in the value. -->
<xsd:element name="value" type="xsd:string" dfdl:escapeSchemeRef="DefaultPropertiesEscapeScheme"/>
</xsd:sequence>
Without the scheme, I get an error. With it, it works great.
So is this an inappropriate use of an escape scheme?
From: Steve Hanson [mailto:smh at uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:47 AM
To: Garriss Jr., James P.
Cc: dfdl-wg at ogf.org; Mike Beckerle
Subject: RE: [DFDL-WG] clarification on when escape characters are needed
James
I don't see how an escape scheme helps here. The "f82+=7&%q" is all data, there's no escape character.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group<http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/>
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh at uk.ibm.com<mailto:smh at uk.ibm.com>
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: "Garriss Jr., James P." <jgarriss at mitre.org<mailto:jgarriss at mitre.org>>
To: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM at IBMGB, Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com<mailto:mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>>,
Cc: "dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>>
Date: 19/06/2013 12:33
Subject: RE: [DFDL-WG] clarification on when escape characters are needed
________________________________
> The DFDL 1.0 spec implies the behaviour where you get…
If this is the direction the WG goes, can you please make this explicit rather than implicit? Using Mike’s excellent example below would go a long way to making the issue clear.
As for a solution, would it not be better to use an escape scheme, like this?
<sequence dfdl:separator="=" dfdl:separatorPosition="infix">
<element name="a" type="xs:string"/>
<element name="b" type="xs:string" dfdl:escapeSchemeRef="DefaultPropertiesEscapeScheme"/>
</sequence>
(Cred to Taylor)
If so, it would be helpful to include that in the example.
From: dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org> [mailto:dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Hanson
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:29 AM
To: Mike Beckerle
Cc: dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] clarification on when escape characters are needed
The DFDL 1.0 spec implies the behaviour where you get:
<a>password</a>
<b>f82+</b>
followed by a processing error. There is no special casing of the last element in the group.
Changing the model to the following achieves the desired infoset:
<sequence dfdl:separator="=" dfdl:separatorPosition="infix">
<element name="a" type="xs:string"/>
<sequence dfdl:separator="">
<element name="b" type="xs:string"/>
</sequence>
</sequence>
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group<http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/>
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh at uk.ibm.com<mailto:smh at uk.ibm.com>
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: Tim Kimber/UK/IBM at IBMGB
To: dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>,
Date: 19/06/2013 09:37
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] clarification on when escape characters are needed
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
________________________________
In the IBM implementation we have taken the view that the separator defines the format for all of the group's content. That means that all separators are counted as being significant, even if they occur within the content region of the final group member.
I agree that other interpretations are possible - the MRM parser in earlier versions of WebSphere Message Broker takes an infix separator out of scope when it encounters the final declared child of a group.
I intend to address this point when I write up the rules for matching string literals and delimiters.
regards,
Tim Kimber, DFDL Team,
Hursley, UK
Internet: kimbert at uk.ibm.com<mailto:kimbert at uk.ibm.com>
Tel. 01962-816742
Internal tel. 37246742
From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com<mailto:mbeckerle.dfdl at gmail.com>>
To: dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>,
Date: 19/06/2013 03:52
Subject: [DFDL-WG] clarification on when escape characters are needed
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org>
________________________________
Suppose I have a sequence. It has an infix separator which is "=".
<sequence dfdl:separator="=" dfdl:separatorPosition="infix">
<element name="a" type="xs:string"/>
<element name="b" type="xs:string"/>
</sequence>
Now, consider this data:
password=f82+=7&%q
I want
<a>password</a>
<b>f82+=7&%q</b>
Notice how the b element contains an '=' which was not escaped in any way in the sequence. Element b is statically known to be last, the separator is infix; hence, things are unambiguous even if there is no escaping.
However, there is an alternative interpretation, which is that the above data should fail, because it produces <a>password</a><b>f82+</b> but then does not find the expected stuff next. Rather it finds the '=7&%q' data. In other words, the sequence separator divides the sequence content into 3 content regions, but there aren't 3 things to consume those, so it is a processing error.
Which is correct?
--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com<http://www.tresys.com/>
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org<mailto:dfdl-wg at ogf.org>
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20130619/9ca08fa7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list