[DFDL-WG] Escape Scheme propsal

[Alan Powell]

All

Attached is a proposal for specifying escape schemes

Points of discussion

As specified escaping applies only to String logical types represented as 
text. Is it needed for Numbers or Calendars types with text 
representation? I think not. 
Message Broker only escapes variable length text fields but I have not 
made that restriction.
Is the interaction between escaping and padding clear enough?



Alan Powell

 MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley,  Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
 Notes Id: Alan Powell/UK/IBM     email: alan_powell at uk.ibm.com 
 Tel: +44 (0)1962 815073                  Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20090126/4077a5af/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ggf-dfdl-escape-scheme-v1.0-001.doc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 176128 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20090126/4077a5af/attachment-0001.obj