[dfdl-wg] Updated documents

Robert E. McGrath mcgrath at ncsa.uiuc.edu
Mon Feb 6 09:39:30 CST 2006


Thanks Martin.

I think this is coming along very nicely.  The mists are clearing for
me, I'm beginning to understand how this is going to work. :-)

In particular, the Conversions docuement, section 6 (pp. 8-9) is
starting to make a lot of sense to me.

I'll be interested to hear what others think of this material.

On Saturday 04 February 2006 18:06, Westhead, Martin (Martin) wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I have taken another pass at the conversions material. Here are two
> documents that came from the document that was "Conversions". The first
> is still called "Conversions" and focuses entirely on the semantics of
> conversions and how they are chosen. The second document contains all
> the material that could be considered "extensions" (so that's what I
> called it :-) )
>
>
>
> The intention here is to separate out the motivational issues. IMO we
> need the material in the first document in order to explain the
> operation of a DFDL parser. (I do not claim that this is the right
> material just that we need an explanation of how this works and this is
> a proposal to meet that need). The second document contains material
> that may be regarded differently in terms of implementation cost/benefit
> by different groups in the WG and we should discuss which bits make
> sense as required (for all implementations) and which might be optional.
>
>
>
> I have included new examples in both documents, inspired by Steve's
> suggestions.
>
>
>
> I am aware that all of this material needs the details attending to.
> There are a number of design decisions that I made arbitrarily in order
> to get a document out to try to communicate the broad ideas. Assuming
> the ideas are adopted we will need to work through all the details of
> the syntax etc. Mike brought up a number of such issues in his response
> to the first draft of this stuff last week. I have not attempted to
> really answer these yet, I am still working at communicating the ideas
> to the group as a whole.
>
>
>
> I did make some minor changes to the syntax largely to try to make the
> ideas clearer.
>
>
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Martin

-- 
---
Robert E. McGrath, Ph.D.
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
1205 West Clark
Urbana, Illinois 61801
(217)-333-6549

mcgrath at ncsa.uiuc.edu





More information about the dfdl-wg mailing list