[DAIS-WG] OGF 30 DAIS-WG Session Minutes

[Oscar Corcho]

Thanks for the minutes Steven,

With respect to the SPARQLFed part, Carlos is very actively involved  
in it now from the W3C perspective, since he is currently editing that  
part of the spec documents. I agree that it seems to be a bit out of  
scope of what WS-DAI-RDF is proposing, although probably we should  
make a strong reference to that in the current specs.

I do not think that any of the changes in the WS-DAI-RDF spec will  
contribute any changes to the WS-DAI core part, but correct me if I am  
wrong.

Oscar

El 26/10/2010, a las 10:33, Steven Lynden escribió:

> OGF 30 DAIS-WG Session; 25th October 2010
>
> Attendees:
>
> Steven Lynden
> Jens Jensen
> Hideo Matsuda
> Isao Kojima
> Neil Chue Hong
>
> Isao gave an intro to the specs. Steven followed up with an overview
> of WS-DAI, WS-DAIR and WS-DAIX. Current status of these was discussed.
>
> Jens says that multiple reviewers can be approached and volunteers to
> see if he can do anything on that front.
>
> Isao goes over WS-DAI-RDF. One issue is that the W3C is defining
> SPARQL-update and SPARQLFed. We need to assess the implications for
> the RDF querying specification.
> Steven comments that bringing in something like SPARQLFed to
> specifically support distributed query processing is inconsistent with
> what WS-DAIR/WS-DAIX did and may be out of scope and will make the
> spec more complex.
>
> It is suggested that it might be a good idea to contact W3C people and
> try to discuss with them.
>
> How to promote engagement/adoption of the specs is discussed. Jens
> suggests International Science Grid This Week (http://www.isgtw.org)
> if we have a good story to tell about applications. Many subscribers
> and widely read.
> We also need well-documented, supported implementations along the
> lines of the WS-DAI and WS-DAIX implementations provided by the
> OGSA-DAI project.
>
> --
>
> Some brief feedback from the WS-DAI/WS-DAIR spec reviewer:
>
> The reviewer says that the spec documents have been annotated but not
> written up yet. One preliminary comment is: what happens if another
> spec, e.g. the RDF spec requires a change to the core spec?
>
> --
> --
>  dais-wg mailing list
>  dais-wg at ogf.org
>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dais-wg