[DAIS-WG] WS-DAI specification namespaces?

[Dave Berry]

You should check with the OGF editor.  There is a process whereby minor
errata can be corrected in published documents.  I don't know whether
this would count as merely "errata"; it might be a v1.1.

Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dais-wg-bounces at ogf.org 
> [mailto:dais-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Malcolm Atkinson
> Sent: 19 October 2007 08:40
> To: Mario Antonioletti; Isao Kojima
> Cc: dais-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [DAIS-WG] WS-DAI specification namespaces?
> 
> I think the correct procedure is to start developing a formal 
> revision,
> issuing a list of proposed amendments to the list and 
> soliciting proposals
> for others.
> 
> The changes should also be noted in the experience report which is a
> necessary part of converting the standards proposal into an 
> agreed standard.
> 
> Malcolm
> 
> 
> 
> On 19/10/07 07:45, "Mario Antonioletti" <mario at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi,
> >     I spoke to Mike about this (he's doing an implementation) who
> > seemed ok about this. I'm not sure what the process is for 
> changing a
> > published spec is. Anyone know or where I should look? 
> Isao, it might
> > be good to log this item as a tracker.
> > 
> > Mario
> > 
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Isao Kojima wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> We are working for another WS-DAI realization for RDF and 
> we started to
> >> define
> >> the namespaces for our RDF(S) based on the WS-DAI core model.
> >> Current our namespace definition will be as followis
> >> 
> >> http://www.ogf.org/dais/2007/10/ws-dai-rdfs/query
> >> 
> >> This notation is based on GFD.84.
> >> However, in  WS-DAI specifications, the namespaces are described as
> >> 
> >> http://www.ggf.org/namespaces/2005/01/WS-DAI/
> >> 
> >> www.ggf.org is ok in GFD84 but /namespaces/ should be 
> equal as the project
> >> name , i.e.  /dais/
> >> 
> >> The reason is that WS-DAIs(GFD74,75,76) are submitted 
> earlier than GFD84.
> >> However, JSDL(GFD56) in 2005 already has GFD84 style 
> namespace format.
> >> 
> >> Have you already noticed this?  We think that we had 
> better to modify them
> >> to fit GFD84 if we havethe chance to modify them until the 
> final standards.
> >> 
> >> Regards.
> >> Isao
> >> --
> >>  dais-wg mailing list
> >>  dais-wg at ogf.org
> >>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dais-wg
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> +-------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------+
> > |Mario Antonioletti:EPCC,JCMB,The King's 
> Buildings,Edinburgh EH9 3JZ.   |
> > |Tel:0131 650 
> 5141|mario at epcc.ed.ac.uk|http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/~mario/ |
> > 
> +-------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------+
> > --
> >   dais-wg mailing list
> >   dais-wg at ogf.org
> >   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dais-wg
> 
> --
>   dais-wg mailing list
>   dais-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dais-wg
>