Collapse: Earth Overshoot Day

[grarpamp]

Burning Methane or Propane yields primarily
harmless CO2 and H2O, a year of cooking is
nothing compared to what the average plane,
truck, car, railroad, power plant, trash plant,
furnaces, etc belches in an hour.
Of course stupid breeding humans chopped
down all the trees so CO2 goes up.

What these Fraudulent Eco-WEF tyrants aren't telling you is...
- Open the window
- What happens when overpopulation burns up all the gas
- All the gas is being burnt up
- Life as you know it is doomed, be prepared


The Gas Stove Scare Is A Fraud Created By Climate Change Authoritarians

https://alt-market.us/the-gas-stove-scare-is-a-fraud-created-by-climate-change-authoritarians/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-agency-refuses-cite-research-supporting-potential-natural-gas-stove-ban
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c04707
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_gas&diff=1117426134&oldid=1117424901
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chidgk1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24429203/
https://www.aga.org/news/news-releases/aga-statement-on-the-international-journal-of-environmental-research-and-public-health-report/
https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gas_appliance_equity_factsheet.pdf

https://archive.org/details/TheFirstGlobalRevolution/page/n85
https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/

In the past I have often tried to take a big picture approach to the
issues facing the American public and how there is almost always a
deeper connection between a variety of political and economic events.
And, what has become increasingly clear to me is that in order to
understand government actions and geopolitics, you must always ask
yourself “Who benefits?”

The bottom line is this – At the heart of nearly every conflict and
every crisis the same group of power mongers usually benefits, and
they have taken a keen interest in the climate change narrative in
particular. But like I said, this is the big picture. Right now I’d
like to take a look at a relatively small issue and how the little
dominoes lead up to a bigger con game and a bigger disaster. Let’s
talk about gas stoves…

Frankly, I don’t care about what my stove uses to cook with as long as
it works. That said, around 38% of US households use natural gas for
cooking and heating. That’s a significant percentage of people that
rely on gas based energy for their daily needs. Here’s the problem,
though – Natural gas is not politically correct these days. Nearly all
carbon emitting energy sources have been marked by climate activists
and western governments as a threat that needs to be erased between
2030 to 2050.

Globalist institutions and climate change grifters have put natural
gas on the naughty list, but there are a couple of realities that must
be addressed. First, as noted, a vast portion of the western world
including the US and Europe rely on natural gas for numerous energy
applications. Ban natural gas and civilization faces an immediate
plunge in economic activity, as well as much higher prices on all
remaining energy sources due to increasing demand. There is NO green
energy solution that can fill the same roll as gas.

All you have to do is look at Europe and the UK today and see how they
are struggling with vastly higher costs due to sanctions on Russian
gas exports. It’s a mess, and they are lucky that the winter has so
far been rather mild, because the moment things freeze, they are in
trouble. There are not enough alternative energy resources available
to fulfill Europe’s shortages if the temperatures plummet.

But what does this have to do with banning gas stoves in the US? Isn’t
that a health issue rather than an environmental issue? No, it’s not a
health issue, it’s a climate agenda issue being rebranded as a health
issue.

There has been a coordinated government and media blitz on the gas
stove narrative this week, with an avalanche of claims that natural
gas causes everything from asthma in children to a slowdown in
cognitive development. What is the evidence for these claims? The
Biden Administration and the agency weighing a potential ban, the
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), have not given specific
sources yet.

The assertions are most likely rooted in a single study published in
December by the International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health in December. The group is privately funded and this
particular study on gas stoves was led by RMI, a non-profit research
entity that advocates for aggressive green policies and works to
“transform global energy systems across the real economy.” The two
lead authors, Talor Gruenwald and Brady Seals, are RMI researchers who
have contributed to the group’s “carbon-free buildings” initiative.

In other words, the study is written by people with a built in bias,
and since science these days is now being linked to activism, no
single study funded by a private ideological group can be trusted. RMI
is not only part of the climate cult, they also promote “equity”
theory and general woke politics. These concepts and real science
cannot coexist.

The American Gas Association made this exact point in a responding
statement, noting that the study’s testing did not include real life
appliance usage, and:

    “Ignored [previous] literature, including one study of data
collected from more than 500,000 children in 47 countries that
‘detected no evidence’ of an association between the use of gas as a
cooking fuel and either asthma symptoms or asthma diagnosis.”

The push for a gas stove ban is not about health, it’s about control.
It is an attempt to falsely link carbon emissions and energy products
to negative health concerns as a way to trick the public into
supporting decarbonization out of fear. But why revert to such a
strategy? Is the climate cult really that desperate?

Yes, yes they are.

You see, the truth about climate change is beginning to spread to the
masses, and the debunking of anti-carbon propaganda is picking up
momentum. Here are the facts:

The average global temperature is not climbing to dangerous levels.
The Earth’s temps have increased according to the NOAA by less than
1°C in the past century.

There is no evidence that this kind of temperature increase represents
a threat to the environment or human health. In fact, the Earth’s
temps have been much higher than they are today multiple times in the
Earth’s history long before man-made carbon emissions were a thing.
The official temperature record used by climate scientists only goes
back to the 1880s – That is a TINY sliver of time in comparison to the
epic lifespan of the Earth’s atmosphere.

And what about all those arguments that there are more dangerous
weather patterns emerging due to global warming? That’s a lie. There
is no significant difference between storm patterns today compared to
100 years ago.

And let’s not forget that global warming propaganda has been going on
a long time now. Back when I was a kid in the 1980s, they used to tell
us in school that large parts of continents would be under water by
the year 2000. This obviously never happened and likely never will.
Many of us who grew up in that era are still waiting around for the
icecaps to melt.

The climate change agenda is about giving governments and globalist
institutions the power to bottleneck energy usage, tax carbon
emissions and thus control almost every aspect of our daily lives.
Without the free flow of carbon based energy almost all industry will
collapse. Green energy is inefficient and cannot fill the void left
behind by gas, petroleum and coal. All that would be left is a minimal
manufacturing base, minimal food production and a shrinking human
population. Those that survive would be slaves to carbon restrictions;
it would be a living nightmare.

There are very rich and powerful people out there that greatly benefit
from such a scenario.

The globalists have been scheming to use environmentalism as an excuse
for centralization since at least 1972, when the Club Of Rome, a
think-tank attached to the UN, published a treatise titled ‘The Limits
To Growth’. Twenty years later they would publish a book titled ‘The
First Global Revolution.’ In that document they specifically recommend
using global warming as a vehicle:

    “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we
came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their
totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common
threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in
designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which
we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for
causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural
processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that
they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

The statement comes from Chapter 5 – The Vacuum, which covers their
desire for global government. The quote is relatively clear; a common
enemy must be conjured in order to trick humanity into uniting under a
single banner – The globalist banner. And the elites see environmental
catastrophe, caused by mankind itself, as the best possible motivator.

How does this agenda start? It starts with gas stoves. It starts with
something we might see as small, and then it grows from there. Pretty
soon, they will be banning natural gas for heating. They will ban wood
stoves. They will artificially induce gas price inflation. Then they
will implement carbon taxation on manufacturers which will in turn
cause prices to rise for consumers. Then there will be carbon taxes
for the average individual. They will use whatever means at their
disposal to make it impossible to use “fossil fuels.”

Again, it’s not about health, it’s about control. It’s always about
control. The gas stove issue is a fraud; one domino in a long chain
that leads to carbon totalitarianism.