Cypherpunks Mailing List Info

[Greg Newby]

I missed the earlier note yesterday:

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:45:49PM -0400, Karl Semich wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2022, 9:49 PM punk <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >         https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks
> >
> >         "the list is frequented...by spooks, trolls, and other sources of
> > negative influence, surveillance or disruption. Sabotage, COINTELPRO and
> > other forms of subversion or attack are often observed."
> >
> >
> >         I think that whoever wrote that, Greg? should also publish the
> > list of government agents who engage in sabotage, COINTELPRO, etc.

I didn't write that, someone else did.

I don't know anything about who are the subscribers to the list. It's an open list, so there is no reason for government or whomever to approach me if they want to monitor the list.



> >         Whoever wrote that obviously knows who these 'actors' are, and
> > there's no reason for him to protect them.
> >
> >
> >         I'll be waiting, as I think any other honest poster will.
> >
> 
> Reminds of before I forgot everything, seeing that quote.
> 
> Things seemed much simpler on only one side.
> 
> Would you like we started a list? Maybe we could start with properties of
> behavior, see if any cross-correlate with properties of spy orgs. Maybe
> scrape archives for helpful experience logs or something, if they're still
> there by the time they're downloaded.

Raw data to facilitate analysis of writings by people who have posted to cypherpunks is easy enough - the full archive is freely available, and even the archive from before the list was in its current home.

	https://lists.cpunks.org

Of course, that doesn't help with (a) lurkers, (b) remailers/redistributors, (c) people who don't subscribe, but watch the archives, and (d) any other surveillance to individual or collective list members.
  ~ Greg
  

> I could use my behavior properties being labeled and timestamped pretty
> badly.
> 
> >