[spam] [archive] [hacking] Working on finalising a mobile python driver.

Karl gmkarl at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 02:59:45 PST 2021


(to clarify, a line number between two of them, not the output call,
was in the traceback)
adding output to the function that calls that one

On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> None of my output statements, which I only added to that method,
> output anything, but one of them is listed in the traceback.  I
> rebuild just to make sure.
>
> On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The line is a call to python's asyncio functions, but none of the
>> function content is in the traceback.
>>
>> I add output statements to determine when the the instruction pointer
>> is jumping.
>>
>> On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The problem still occurs, with a different line in the same method
>>> listed in the traceback.
>>>
>>> It used to line 84.  Now it is line 83.  But because I added some
>>> module-scope definitions, the method body has shifted down and it's a
>>> different part of the logic.
>>>
>>
>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list