[spam] [archive] [hacking] Working on finalising a mobile python driver.

[Karl]

it was a mistake hidden by a traceback error.  i was using a library
class method as an object method, and the class method constructs an
object in it.

On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> (to clarify, a line number between two of them, not the output call,
> was in the traceback)
> adding output to the function that calls that one
>
> On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> None of my output statements, which I only added to that method,
>> output anything, but one of them is listed in the traceback.  I
>> rebuild just to make sure.
>>
>> On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The line is a call to python's asyncio functions, but none of the
>>> function content is in the traceback.
>>>
>>> I add output statements to determine when the the instruction pointer
>>> is jumping.
>>>
>>> On 1/14/21, Karl <gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The problem still occurs, with a different line in the same method
>>>> listed in the traceback.
>>>>
>>>> It used to line 84.  Now it is line 83.  But because I added some
>>>> module-scope definitions, the method body has shifted down and it's a
>>>> different part of the logic.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>