Trying to Connect with a Hacker Online

[Karl]

On 10/12/20, Stefan Claas <sac at 300baud.de> wrote:
> Stefan Claas wrote:
>> | Stefan, I got:
>> |
>> AgAAAHYwSAAAAO+xQIT5meBNroABRxnwz1nF8Apub/z5OiqCftZUpGTBbcejwe6XQF4lpAnhW9YG
>> | NAl9/zdLkj8FOG2NQmhbx82HXJv1Ju2c1w==
>> | from you.  Is this the same encrypted message as the one you sent?  I'm
>> expecting that it is.

AgAAAHYwjgEAACeQYcUutIj71LXOwf6SZU3wiTMAhlKBNAw552GqDynQ4nKtGX2l+5beCjexTFSW
+MTj6dbJhjfTVpRzalwY19NSWrjeFZpy3WLi78oz3Yh/Tt7tLI630KJUO5vlAOqLM8IJmV4//ZeG
2AQgpofe61FXDm8H/SXRNFGD9K3Y/sIwtFbzGgyNJxEMIILTtkGCuWvr3Ub6nS06m4PuwP4Eeu0a
ObmohUDGnXNuKEiULvyBbP2X05+s5ogXrzN5lh3pAW3q345kWDteqvqdS3o6baVTYthEb63m5dRg
vIPIeto8v0ZBqJ9zZqIGPKlthQ9u0TXHR4xrdUUWKVxZfyOP906PPSmmoc10zQtWR3Bw9rZ3ym9Y
HxXSu8YvnvGqH+IHzn4qYZYh+WywfcNwoygyNVKuswXDSbz1okDq0yMixIoi6at5ZHCJZDmu9KJx
+LwUQWw7FYR9u2TqFsb+/w8snk9SI8gBTQW4jDoDDbGYYySDQqJA4SOhATwEMRuBySZEQbJ+qtlv
zpPl4upnvipG


>
> BTW. NaClbox messages are authenticated, so no one can send you a message
> in
> my name, if they are not in possession of my private key. This avoids then
> also to use signatures, like with GnuPG.
>
> And the IMHO cool thing about NaClbox is that it is much easier to use and
> learn than GnuPG.

Why do you not use naclbox to communicate all the time?  Couldn't it
even be used for the cypherpunks mailing list, if the mailing list had
a shared receiving private key, to verify that each person is saying
what they intend?

k's thinkpad, tor source folder,
c72e81da09e333bc8804205bcfcf3bd8821cad61ad862d57114339e5ee00a664