Trying to Connect with a Hacker Online

Stefan Claas sac at 300baud.de
Mon Oct 12 10:55:53 PDT 2020


Karl wrote:
 
> On 10/12/20, Stefan Claas <sac at 300baud.de> wrote:
> > Stefan Claas wrote:
> >> | Stefan, I got:
> >> |
> >> AgAAAHYwSAAAAO+xQIT5meBNroABRxnwz1nF8Apub/z5OiqCftZUpGTBbcejwe6XQF4lpAnhW9YG
> >> | NAl9/zdLkj8FOG2NQmhbx82HXJv1Ju2c1w==
> >> | from you.  Is this the same encrypted message as the one you sent?  I'm
> >> expecting that it is.
> 
> AgAAAHYwjgEAACeQYcUutIj71LXOwf6SZU3wiTMAhlKBNAw552GqDynQ4nKtGX2l+5beCjexTFSW
> +MTj6dbJhjfTVpRzalwY19NSWrjeFZpy3WLi78oz3Yh/Tt7tLI630KJUO5vlAOqLM8IJmV4//ZeG
> 2AQgpofe61FXDm8H/SXRNFGD9K3Y/sIwtFbzGgyNJxEMIILTtkGCuWvr3Ub6nS06m4PuwP4Eeu0a
> ObmohUDGnXNuKEiULvyBbP2X05+s5ogXrzN5lh3pAW3q345kWDteqvqdS3o6baVTYthEb63m5dRg
> vIPIeto8v0ZBqJ9zZqIGPKlthQ9u0TXHR4xrdUUWKVxZfyOP906PPSmmoc10zQtWR3Bw9rZ3ym9Y
> HxXSu8YvnvGqH+IHzn4qYZYh+WywfcNwoygyNVKuswXDSbz1okDq0yMixIoi6at5ZHCJZDmu9KJx
> +LwUQWw7FYR9u2TqFsb+/w8snk9SI8gBTQW4jDoDDbGYYySDQqJA4SOhATwEMRuBySZEQbJ+qtlv
> zpPl4upnvipG
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> > BTW. NaClbox messages are authenticated, so no one can send you a message
> > in
> > my name, if they are not in possession of my private key. This avoids then
> > also to use signatures, like with GnuPG.
> >
> > And the IMHO cool thing about NaClbox is that it is much easier to use and
> > learn than GnuPG.
> 
> Why do you not use naclbox to communicate all the time?  Couldn't it
> even be used for the cypherpunks mailing list, if the mailing list had
> a shared receiving private key, to verify that each person is saying
> what they intend?

Well, I often receive message in PGP format, because I still have a key
pair for GnuPG. Otherwise I already use NaClbox with friends in Germany,
the United States and Canada. :-)

Regarding the ML, I think the list-owner would not be amused and probably
many subscribers would not like the idea either. For that people could use
the Usenet group alt.anonymous.messages with a shared hashed subject (hsub)
in order to fetch messages, from a.a.m..

Regards
Stefan

-- 
NaClbox: cc5c5f846c661343745772156a7751a5eb34d3e83d84b7d6884e507e105fd675
  The computer helps us to solve problems, we did not have without him.


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list