Militia, law, impressment, guns, history

[Zig the N.g]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:01:48AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> > such implicit arguments have frequently been cited by (mostly
> > liberal?) debaters, and much of the clueless populace, lacking any sort of
> > legal education, accepts them without apparent question.)
> 
> The Anti-Gun crowd generally avoids quoting, analyzing
> and debating law and its historical context and reasons.
> This is because it simply does not support their
> Anti-Gun position. And because sidestepping needing to
> voice or contend with such things makes their agenda easier.
> 
> It's also relavant that most of them have never spent an
> afternoon or year learning the sport, defense, hunting, law,
> comparative statistics, etc.
> 
> Let alone been exposed to or explored larger free thought
> subjects such as...
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_secession
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_rights_and_legal_rights
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntaryism
> 
> > Now, a state might hypothetically have a LAW requiring a militia
> > member to respond to a call.   But that law would not necessarily
> > be Constitutional
> 
> These sorts of "laws", including "mandatory service", taxes, etc
> are all immoral and against natural law... forcing somone to
> take an action, slavery, whatever you want others to do,
> them having done nothing to you.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscientious_objector
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impressment
> 
> Took till 1995 for even the UN to begin to understand
> that conscription and impressment are wrong.



  Nation's Murderous Psychopaths Undecided On Whether They’ll Follow New Gun Laws
  https://babylonbee.com/news/murderous-psychopaths-undecided-on-whether-theyll-follow-new-gun-laws

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Democrats such as Beto O’Rourke have proposed a
    number of new gun laws, such as universal background checks, a
    ban on magazines that hold more than ten bullets, and possibly
    even a “mandatory buyback” of some weapons such as AR-15s. While
    these laws are likely to be a headache for law-abiding gun
    owners, the nation’s murderous psychopaths aren’t quite certain
    how the laws will affect them.

    “The background check sounds concerning,” explained deranged
    murderer Steve Mason, known as “Murdering Steve” to his friends.
    “I would definitely fail it since I’m a well-known psychopath.
    But I’ve never actually purchased a gun through a gun-dealer; I
    just steal all my murder weapons. And so far no one has proposed
    a background check on theft, so I think I’m good.”

    Jake Foster, who is planning a shooting spree, expressed similar
    concerns about the ban on “high-capacity” magazines. “Having to
    do a shooting spree and reloading after every tenth shot does
    sound irritating,” said Foster. “Despite the law, I might just
    use a high-capacity magazine anyway. I guess the question is
    whether I’m willing to deal with a possible fine on top of the
    multiple counts of murder.”

    One law murderous psychopaths did seem excited about was the
    AR-15 buyback. “If they offer a lot of money for my AR-15, it
    could be pretty worthwhile,” said nutjob Craig McGee. “Then I can
    use that money to buy more guns just as lethal... but through the
    black market, of course. Gotta avoid those background checks.”