Judging Jacob Appelbaum

[Karl]

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 2:22 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks at tfwno.gf> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 06:15:21 -0500
> Karl Semich <0xloem at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020, 12:02 AM professor rat <pro2rat at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > >  I make the error of blaming people.  It is always an error, whoever makes
> > > it..."
> > > >
> > > > This your version of original sin?
> > > nope
> > >
> > > Good. Then you'll stop blaming me for whatever nonsense is going on in
> > > your head and leave me alone.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, yeah, I spout antiblame
>
>
>         Ok, that's something you should stop doing immediately because it's extremely harmful.

Seems like a great way to resist forceful blame to me.  Obviously
antiblame is bad when nobody is blaming anything, and you need to
figure out what causes stuff.  I don't see that situation here.

>         Your 'antiblame' 'ideology' comes directly from eastern theocracies (buddhism then jew-kkkristianity). And you are a 'christian' right?

I like jainism, although i worship nature myself, and both my parents
were catholic so I have a soft spot there.  I wanted to be a monk as a
child, they have such cool brown robes. Worshipping nature lets me
check the reasons for things myself.

>         'Antiblame' 'ideology' is a tool used by the ruling class(aka govcorp) to stop their victims from...blaming the ruling class. Another facet of it is the laughable idea that 'revenge', actually self-defense, is bad. The christian version goes as far as to tell people to 'turn the other cheek' so that christian govcorp can massacre its vitctims more easily.

I'm hearing from you that you're not trying to disrupt this list?
Anyway, the way to sort out what good ideas are, is to ask your older
survivors.  They've figured out when to blame if you want to keep on.

>         Tracing crimes back to their authors, that is assigning 'blame' is a very important defense mechanism.

It's pretty obvious that everything is caused by a myriad of people,
most of whom weren't trying to make it happen.

>         notice that professor turd is hysterically promoting 'antiblame' with his insane denial of the existence of govcorp.
>
>
>
>
> > because I was forced to disrupt communities
> > and turn people against each other,
>
>         are you saying you were(...) a US government agent?

not really.  but i'm a double-brainwashed citizen of the usa, so i
basically am, no?

it's what happens to activists once they're targeted in the usa.  they
get forced to disrupt activist communities.  usually unwittingly, but
often they are overtly coerced to do this.

> > and would be very happy if it turned
> > into a religion because fewer people would die.
>
>         it IS already a religion, and you know it, and you should further know that it's one of the reasons why people DIE, not something that contributes to peace.

is it?  i've been isolated a lot.  i see a lot of religions have it some.

anyway, to parrot marshall rosenberg, since doing that is easier for
me than crying about who i used to be, we need to blame the causes of
things so we can work with them, but blaming _people_ is
counterproductive and produces conflict.

it's like the silliness of imprisoning for stealing if the theft was
food for an urgently starving person in an emergency.  imprisoning
that thief makes the situation _worse_.

> > Hey, um ... would you like me to filter your posts out?  You reference my
> > stuff sometimes.  What kind of responses are better for you?
> >
> > >
>

punk included the above statement i made in their email.  i kind of
regret making it.