acceptable coinage/ currency/ money

[Punk]

On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 10:18:53 +1100
Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:


> 
> 
> 
> > > As we recently learnted from Jordan Peterson, 
> > 
> > 	ok - so you still are a shill for that piece of right wing shit.
> > 	Ergo, you are the problem. 
> 
> Just because person X says something incorrect, does not mean that
> everything person X says must therefore be incorrect.

	I didn't claim that's the case. I do claim that person X making some outrageous and blatantly false claims, and then ignoring counterarguments is proof that person X is not a legitimate intelectual actor. He is a fraud.

> 
> 
> 
> > > hierarchies are rather
> > > fundamental to our biology, 
> > 
> > 	yep, you are the very source of the problem. I'm getting tired of
> > 	your constant flip floping. Go suck peterson's cock, trump's cock
> > 	and putin's cock. 
> 
> Hierarchies are compelling science.

	yop don't know what 'science' means. Your statement makes as much sense as saying "the sky is a pink cake".

> 
> Actual science. Including math.
> 

	Yes, MATH! A = A ergo 'hierarchies' 

	Dig yourself deeper? Nah, don't waste my time and yours.


> 
> > 	And I already pointed out that gold coins are a lot better than
> > 	any form of 'crypto currency'.
> 
> Yes, gold and silver, acceptable coinage. Many would agree. I happen
> to agree.
> 
> And gold and silver coin are perhaps the only reasonable foundation
> for any digital coin.

	I wouldn't put too much 'faith' in such a system. The moment you exchange actual real physical coins for some digital IOU you have a problem. Though admitedly the problem may be mitigated in a libertarian culture. You know, the exact opposite culture of what we have now.