appelbaum's CV and tor's résumé

[Punk-Stasi 2.0]

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:51:45 +0000
coderman <coderman at protonmail.com> wrote:

> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, November 29, 2019 4:10 PM, Razer <g2s at riseup.net> wrote:
> ...
> > Turf war over where the funds went. torbrowser Security or 'User
> > friendly GUI' and increased user base.
> >
> > He was on the security side. Purged by institutional slander. I doubt
> > there's been one charge filed by an alleged victim.
> 
> 
> look at the commits; ioerror had little to contribute security wise or code wise to Tor or tor. (Tor the org and tor the implementation)

	the commits prove exactly nothing. Even a person who didn't code at all could favor 'security' over GUI bullshit and marketing. 

	again, appelbaum was lynched because he didn't fully toe the pentagon's party line. The same party line that the feminazi cunts you previously linked do toe. 



> 
> however there was and is friction between what Tor users want and what Tor Project Inc. funders pay for. this is the fundamental tension!

	I notice how you conveniently leave out the tor turd themselves, syverson and accomplices. 

	Also, it's not clear what the 'tor users' want since they are not an homogeneous or even half educated group. 


> 
> if you look at some of the more interesting security innovations, like Tor on Qubes, Whonix, Tor-ramdisk, etc, they come outside of Tor Project because funders can't or won't cover these use cases.


	those are funded by arpadarpa as well. 



> 
> it's not a turf war when the contracts state up front what work is in scope.


	it's not a turf war. It was just a member of the mafia who wasn't 100% loyal and so was thrown under the bus. By the way, anybody who isn't a total and complete fucktard should draw basic inferences regarding the nature of syverson, dingledine and accomplices based on the 'appelbaum affair'.




> best regards,