SJW's, cry bullies, mentally ill snowflakes, and social "justice" predatory psychopaths —→ stop subsidizing bad behaviour

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 06:30:38PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> was Subject: Re: USA: National Security Strategy, Juan's Wet Dream -- OFF-TOPIC (James Donald is a creep)
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 10:54:35AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:20:46AM +1000, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
> > > On 12/28/2017 07:42 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> > > > Who will cry for your death, James?  Who will miss you?  Nobody.
> > > Social Justice Warriors always project.  I hear the voice of a woman who has cats instead of children.
> > > 
> > > When you die, no one will notice, and your cats will eat you.
> > > 
> > > I have children, I have grandchildren.  You think you have friends, but observe how progressives treat their
> > > "friends".
> > 
> > Indeed.  Like Jacob Applebaum was treated by his "progressive" Tor
> > Inc "friends" ...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > When progs die, their cats eat them.
> 
> 
> When an "SJW" cry bully becomes a psychopath predating on the
> world dishing out benefits for being "offended".
> 
> Yes, being offended is the "new black" manipulation of those with
> weak minds - which is ironically in some sense a service in the vein
> of "a fool and 'is money are easily separated, and to fail to do so
> is to fail to teach an important life lesson to one in dire need"...
> 
> Still, predatory behaviour is predatory behaviour, so how might you
> turn the tables?
> 
> 
> 
> Are Social Justice Warriors Snowflakes? Or Just Cold…
> https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-28/are-social-justice-warriors-snowflakes-or-just-cold
>   …In other words, this is predatory behavior. The easily offended
>   may “sincerely” believe that they are wronged. But that doesn’t
>   prove anything.  It is possible to “sincerely” believe slavery is
>   a humane institution, just as many did long ago. And who says Paul
>   doesn’t sincerely believe in his own “victimhood”?
> 
>   …It is greed and power lust that makes people predisposed to
>   feeling offended.
> 
>   …If a woman dies, the reproductive power of the group is
>   diminished. Our ancestors, hence, did everything they could to
>   protect women.
>   If you weren’t biased in favor of women, you didn’t leave
>   descendants. Feminism isn’t modern, as they say.
> 
>   …We all are descended from ancestors who were biased in favor of
>   women.
>   Men were, and still are, seen as disposable. This has nothing to do
>   with genuine compassion, fragility or sensitivity. This is
>   politically motivated behavior.
> 
>   …The “easily offended” are not too attached to principals, as their
>   critics assume.
> 
>   …If you think it is “human” to feel offended, think about this: Why
>   are you tempted to feeloffended, instead of, say, debating your
>   opponents?
> 
>   …It is strange we find it unacceptable to question how reasonable
>   someone’s “feelings” are. It is strange we find it acceptable to
>   say, “I am offended.”
> 
>   …There is something more important that social justice warriors and
>   their critics miss.
>   There is a huge difference between feeling oppressed by cruelty and
>   feeling oppressed by disagreement.
>   These impulses are not just different, but stem from opposing
>   motives and values. People who feel more oppressed by cruelty are
>   less likely to feel oppressed by disagreement, and people who feel
>   more oppressed by disagreement are less likely to feel oppressed by
>   cruelty.
> 
>   …The solution, of course, is to stop subsidizing bad behavior.


Those who would subsidize bad behaviour, create safe spaces for the
melting snowflakes, remove the need for "trigger warnings" and
otherwise subsidize the cry bullies, are rife within the ranks of our
"modern" "Western" "culture":

https://lwn.net/Articles/753646/


Sad days...