Twitter working on identifying permanently suspended users...
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Mon Feb 13 00:26:50 PST 2017
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:45:00AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> From: Razer <g2s at riseup.net>
> On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote:
>
> From: Razer <g2s at riseup.net>
>
> >>>Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how:
> >>> https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety
> >>> ...and no one writing it up seems to know either
>
> >>What I want to know, is: What is their definition of the word, "harass"? >>Contradict? Disprove? Argue against? Make unhappy?
> >>Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political statements aren't allowed? >> Jim Bell
>
> >Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you.
>
> >I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their policy is 'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets harassment complaints against them that are verifiable.
> But I'm still waiting for a definition of "harassment". Do you have your own?
"Razzer's gone wild" - definitions for the modern man:
harassment - marketing / propaganda
fascist - marketing / propaganda
tolerant - marketing / propaganda
liberal - marketing / propaganda
inclusive - marketing / propaganda
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list