Twitter working on identifying permanently suspended users...

jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 12 23:45:00 PST 2017



 From: Razer <g2s at riseup.net>
 On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote:
   
      From: Razer <g2s at riseup.net>
   
   >>>Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how: 
  >>> https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety 
  >>>                       ...and no one writing it up seems to know either
  
  >>What I want to know, is:  What is their definition of the word, "harass"? >>Contradict?  Disprove?  Argue against?  Make unhappy?   
  >>Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political statements aren't allowed?   >> Jim Bell

>Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you.
 
>I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their policy is 'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets harassment complaints against them that are verifiable.
But I'm still waiting for a  definition of "harassment".  Do you have your own?
               Jim Bell

   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 5937 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20170213/c29d9f6a/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list