Global warming/climate change

[Steve Kinney]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 10/24/2016 12:54 PM, jim bell wrote:

> I am aware that climate models run on very powerful computers,
> using extremely sophisticated mathematical models that are being
> continually improved.

Glittering Generalities much lately?

> I am open to the possibility that there may one day be an apparent
> problem, qualitatively.  But science doesn't know, quantitatively,
> what the size of the problem is.

So calculation of CO2 discharges based on fuel consumption statistics,
which correlate with contemporary and historical atmospheric CO2
measurements, which correlate with historical and contemporary
measurements of ocean surface pH, which correlate with measurements of
atmospheric and oceanic temperatures, etc. are not quantitative?  One
might try to dispute the causal links between some of these observed
phenomena, but that would be an uphill battle against a /massive/
consensus of professionals in the relevant fields.

So far, those with the most to gain or lose financially - our
petrochemicails industries - have had to resort to classic propaganda
techniques to dispute the current consensus model in geophysics.

> This solution will, however, piss off the AGW (anthropogenic Global
> Warming) fanatics, if for no other reason that it will seem to them
> to be too easy.

Name Calling much lately?

;o)





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYDkdUAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqFUIIAI9C/rOMd7n/0LwoRwooC466
CoSTEyIytrn3H3ospQoK4Sd1lG1PQ9YNMowRp0o73+VeABAdhOeRd/ofP0SOT9Jp
2Gtkig342+mfEC/GHl5bu9fCH3RMIOe+enI3tYOvEX7MjAqkqk+9QuCRTwMab+yt
zmdLJF+yKTMTlDaOqKQqgffKLisAtyOb4alBNgxfZTC00qDwapRD0Xm5tIDf6PLS
PbyUzXdoH1dIgDxL3FwyF5G3a/EYrsww2Wdy9Y3C9/53cSjEkC8AjAh3f5Fbb62/
4kCDtzUh7A8B2B9oyFqknCv4+IF1Lcdu1rDq+wmecA4uRxlyd1wSAy6L0bHfoIA=
=UAIt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----