Scientific Progress

[Mirimir]

On 11/03/2016 08:20 PM, John wrote:
> Hey - that's the second time you said you were "done" with me. After making a raft of bogus allegations.  Interesting rhetorical technique ;)
> 
> Cosmic parody? "Sonny" (lol)?  Something here is a cosmic parody, but it isn't some words and beliefs you've put in my mouth. 

Hey, friends don't let friends talk to Juan ;)

> Cheers
> 
> John
> 
> On November 3, 2016 6:27:59 PM EDT, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 	There isn't any hypocrysy on my part. I unlike you do not
>> 	advocate STATISM and CENSORSHIP in the 'cypherpunks' mailing
>> 	list. 
>>
>> 	"get rid of your electricity, stay away from hospitals, and go
>> 	live in the woods"
>>
>> 	That's exactly what the most corrupt and stupid statist shitbag
>> 	would say. Do you sonny realize that the belief that all
>> 	'progress' comes from state funded 'science' is its own cosmic
>> 	parody? 
>>
>> 	Corrupt dumbfuck, I'm not wasting any more time with you =) I
>> 	suggest you join the 'crpytography' circle-jerk and get lost.
>>
>>
>>
>> 	
>>
>>
>> 	
>>
>>
>>> Hey, the bots broken again ?  Seems to be on repeat.
>>>
>>> Your blatant hypocrisy was my point, obviously.
>>>
>>> Just because Juan says it (or denies it) - does not make it so.  
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:39 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>>>>    STATIST piece of shit.
>>>>
>>>>    You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>>>>    conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>>>>    wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  
>>>>>
>>>>> And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to
>>>>> bring up. Not punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little
>> whipped
>>>>> bitch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The
>>>>> echo chamber must be comforting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>>>>>>   piece of shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>>>>>>   conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>>>>>>   wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
>>>>>> John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> threw up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
>>>>>>>>   Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
>>>>>>>>   goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
>>>>>>>>   mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
>>>>>>> university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try
>>>>>>> living by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
>>>>>>> hospitals, and go live in the woods.... you can hunt some
>>>>>>> tigers :P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John
>>>>
>