Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?

[Travis Biehn]

I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing.

The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the dark
web, off the deep web and in the search indexes."

Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not.

-Travis

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:

> On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
> > A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug*
>
> Well, there are the access logs ;)
>
> It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better
> than nothing. In my opinion.
>
> Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think.
>
> > Travis
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes,
> >>> that would explain it.
> >>
> >> Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others
> >> despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else
> >> secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn>
| TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus
<https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2379 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151011/6777f8c9/attachment-0002.txt>