[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

[Cari Machet]

I second mirimir

Plus no ask to the list but said asked the list and if the point of the
reveal was to protect the community (fr john) then why was that act >
protecting the community > avoided by mike
On Oct 11, 2015 2:16 AM, "Mirimir" <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:

> On 10/10/2015 02:40 PM, rysiek wrote:
> > Dnia sobota, 10 października 2015 09:58:44 Razer pisze:
> >> On 10/09/2015 07:56 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> >>> In my world, people don't publish stuff that puts their [friends,
> >>> allies, fellow travelers, etc] at risk. Even to make a point.
> >>
> >> Seconding Grarpamp on this.
> >
> > Are you saying John Young shouldn't have published the server logs in the
> > first place? Can't agree more!
>
> I'm saying that nobody should have published Cryptome weblogs. But for
> JYA, it was apparently carelessness. For Mike, it was apparently
> recklessness. Maybe the effect was the same. And both are avoidable. But
> they're not the same.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1311 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151011/5bf1aa42/attachment-0002.txt>