Helmholtz Tubes, CRT Signals (Was: Sigint Dumps)

[Wilfred Guerin]

It is important that the crypto/physics communities prepare primers on the
underlying technologies from a historic design perspective; how does a crt
tv ray gun and beam director work? how does a metal detector work? sculpted
or phased radar, phased array field projection, aegis, etc. Historic roots
would include 1700s electodynamics theory especially electron beam physics
and 1800s mail-order toys like high voltage coils, x-ray tubes and reactant
materials, geissler tubes, helmholdt and maxwell coils, early hf wired and
rf signals before the 1900s textbook stories, and of course guided fields
such as are critical in understanding how these signals systems work in
*earth's* environment.

There is a high resolution model of electrical systems especially focused
on those pesky tubes in 3d lattice alignment in office buildings...

last i heard, 2nd hop distribution is having corruption and extortion
problems, but load rate says the first slice should be done by mid week and
automatically shared as arranged, original data is aligned to the solstice
2014, suggesting more next weekend?

On Saturday, June 13, 2015, John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:

> Excuse delay, thought this went to the cpunks list.
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:39:49 -0400
> Message-ID: <
> CAG+6jObQAytv2+mCvszWx_OgnpGANTaKggsu4jfVn-D1Tb0v5A at mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Helmholtz Tubes, CRT Signals (Was: Sigint Dumps)
> From: Wilfred Guerin <wilfred at vt.edu>
> To: John Young <jya at pipeline.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> To John-
>
> there are over 200 groups discussing the same issues, at least 2 got
> nationalised aggressively, and there have been some tangential posts
> on blogs or commercial forums mainly concerns about their datacenter
> security not knowing who might attack them, but overall the same
> concerns are expressed:
>
> Can the data be spoofed? Not at this resolution without having a model
> of everything at the same resolution...
>
> Are the blocks secure? No. [...] But services are stable.
>
> Exports to public? yes, p2p clusters loading, datacenters doing
> preparation processing, packed table files are set up for distributed
> search
>
> How do *you* know? UHD/4k VNC video stream to one of the master
> control servers handling the database import and text chat with 200
> others, no direct access to data here, but certainty that the data is
> distributing.
>
> Involved how? rendering code to make GEO-TIFF map tiles and aggrigated
> spline/curves to simplify snapshot data and level of detail pyramid
> (multi-variate parametric search) index data.
>
> Now we ask... If this was NATO-ish or any variety of US/UK system
> built in the 1960s(?) can we solve for locations or viable downlink
> targets to intercept? This hint at geo-magnetic shift is a huge
> opportunity!
>
> The coin data is ... glorious... but the other signals are no less
> amusing, one set appears to be wired sigint in mhz carrier bands,
> assumably urban analogue phone signals as recorded from the switch
> routing system's ground or related wiretaps to rf via cable.
>
> genome.gov had links to the various data formats that others
> identified in the organics table.
>
> X-Ray physics and detector materials need research, 1890s through
> 1970s was a huge ammount of X-Ray publicity, but NEVER EVER DID ANYONE
> USE IT FOR SIGNALING??? BULLSHIT!
>
> ALSO!!!
>
> "is there any distinction at military bases or secure areas?" YES.
> there is some access control doors which others suggest is a standard
> card reader with number pad and automatic door that is common on the
> secure layer of military and COMMERCIAL CONTRACTOR facilities that has
> a proximity detector signal built into the door frame. THE COIN DATA
> WARPS AROUND THIS CYLINDRICAL SIGNAL ON THE DOOR PORTAL AND VECTOR
> PASSES THROUGH THE WALL. Obviously the vector is impossible without
> fields projected from that security device! There is also a ghosting
> signature that reduces sample rate (in the digitiser) around similar
> facilities, looks like it was isolated in the newer signal index, so
> it should be really obvious who is using these jamming systems and
> where! (and where else!)
>
> more questions:
>
> coins on boats? yes.
> coins on submarines? YES. (with ghosting)
>
> organic signals? wtf?
>
> Yes, but im told the prior emailed reference is erroneous: the primary
> index is a SIGNALS CHARACTERISTIC tree, the supporting block (large
> bit scope number) is VERY SIMILAR to a genetic expression profile tree
> such as genome.gov/ and many of the gene profiling standards.
>
> Hopefully the news will start posting the technical reports the
> primary groups have been preparing last few days... we need to get
> physics and advanced crypto groups attention, if the signals are
> encoded and that party broke through dense analogue crypto, it will
> take a huge effort to solve for that (it may have been an analogue EM
> field as well that performed the encoding or reference signals) to
> make the same capability posible for others.
>
> Staying alive!
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:08 AM, John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:
> > We're tweeting these posts. Blowback: is any evidence available to
> > support the narrative? Sample of the data, say, for close examination,
> > with credible provenance, not the GG secret pact bloviation.
> >
> > Mild critique: is this sci-fi or legit or both, advancing the
> literary-video
> > prize winning breaking news big screen Hollywood Neal Stephenson
> > spirit of the Snowden "NSA disclosures."
> >
> >
> > At 09:54 AM 6/11/2015, you wrote:
> >>
> >> More specifics on the sigint system:
> >>
> >> This looks like a "Growth Industry" ...
> >>
> >> Access to the beam is not restricted, anyone can pull signals out of
> >> the reconaissance loop from any of its exposed vectors.***
> >>
> >> Viable areas:
> >> Terrestrial:
> >> a: Spurrious emissions from tubes or conduit, beam deflection from
> >> interior particles
> >> b: Stray beams passing through field coils but not redirected
> >> c: Direct access to tubes or conduit (any variety of methods)
> >> Orbital:
> >> d: Geo-Magnetic Shift (downlinks)
> >> e: Refractive / deflection (downlinks)
> >>
> >> As the rate of geo-magnetic shift continues to deform the containment
> >> of the projected fields used to shape and steer the beams (which may
> >> also have something to do with the sensor itself?), wider areas will
> >> be accessible which are hit with the rogue spot beam from orbital (and
> >> projected field electro-magnetic) guides.
> >>
> >> This means almost anyone with a sensor can gather data from the
> downlinks.
> >>
> >> Additionally, spurrious radiation from the terrestrial system is
> >> available around endpoints and field coils, especially from damaged
> >> conduit or particles in the tubes.
> >>
> >> Time to raid the libraries for antique books about 1800s-1980s X-Ray
> >> EM physics and electromagnetic wave guides!
> >>
> >> It would not be rational to encode the carrier signal unless it was
> >> certain that the encoding would not disrupt signals quality, however
> >> raw X-Rated signals might have been too risky?
> >>
> >> [There are Thz ring oscillators, detectors, and various photonic
> >> rings, but properly implemented field-effect lenses, EM field vector
> >> control circuitry and coils(/phased array) (abstract field
> >> projection), and optimal tube design are all that should
> >> theorhetically be needed once a rogue beam is identified. X-Ray
> >> Materials and interference fields must be researched and made common
> >> knowledge.]
> >>
> >> Hopefully the data source is not too easily found and the dumps get
> >> out, this is extremely relevant for "civil liberties", human rights,
> >> and reconstructing your own personal history and records where your
> >> data is otherwise mising.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, Wilfred Guerin <wilfred at vt.edu> wrote:
> >> > Helmholtz Tube, Beam Steering, EM field interaction, simple field
> >> > dynamics, (and your oscilliscope) are all you need to create complex
> >> > EM signals processors.
> >> >
> >> > No different than your antique crypto cracker, which uses an abstract
> >> > field to solve complex pre-defined systems. "56-bit" https cracker was
> >> > mass implemented as a 300mhz backplane EM field solver about the size
> >> > of your desktop computer.
> >> >
> >> > Using the same technology, resolution, and methods, BTC Bitcoins are
> >> > around 8m^3 of field to solve.
> >> >
> >> > No doubt the access and decoding to these sigint signals requires
> >> > similar proessing before being steered to the digitiser.
> >> >
> >> > (Maxwell Tube, Helmholtz Tube, typical of high school physics
> >> > classrooms)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 10081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150614/a520650b/attachment-0002.txt>