tangled context probe

[Tyler Durden]

>As to the crypto relevance: context Arranged signals can be anything at 
>all. If you don't share the context of the communicators, you have no idea 
>what they  convey in their conversation about the "whether".

That's a stretch. Soon you'll say that Post-modernist literary theory is 
Cypherpunkish content because it deals with 'context'.

I suggest you take up your theories with Mr Choate and the Dallas 
Cypherpunk(s). In that 'context' your posts will appear lucid.

-TD


>From: "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <roberte at ripnet.com>
>To: "Roy M. Silvernail" <roy at rant-central.com>
>CC: "cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net" <cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net>
>Subject: Re: tangled context probe
>Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:29:21 -0500
>
>Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
>
>>
>>R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
>>
>>>(curious thing about this spew, it keeps disappearing into the bit 
>>>bucket,
>>
>>
>>Yawn.  Roboposting this babble doesn't really increase its chances of 
>>getting read.  I work through JY because I know there's uranium in that 
>>ore.  But I'm about 2 posts away from ensconcing RW"B"E in my procmail 
>>file next to TM, choate and proffr.
>
>OK, it was just an unknown context for me..
>My sincere apologies for subjecting you to a decrease in signal to noise.
>I know that I have to work on my presentation.
>Without sufficient introduction  anything new is indistinguishable from 
>cracked pottery.
>
>The synthetic perspective I am toying with is built upon some premises from 
>cogsci
>In my opinion there are real strategic implications in the modern 
>scientific perception of the individual as a tangle of competing  
>interests.
>Self interest is one of given principles.
>In so far as the "self" is a personal mythology,
>and the irrationality of sheep hood is built in,
>I think three could be policy implications.
>
>As to the crypto relevance: context
>Arranged signals can be anything at all.
>If you don't share the context of the communicators,
>you have no idea what they  convey
>in their conversation about the "whether".
>
>Once again, I plead stupidity for the duplicates
>I will do penance
>
>--bob