Quarantines may be justified
Harmon Seaver
hseaver at cybershamanix.com
Sat Apr 19 13:46:33 PDT 2003
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 03:55:06PM -0400, david wrote:
> On Saturday 19 April 2003 10:02, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> >
> > Agreed, except for smoking in public. All smoking in public
> > should be banned. No one has the right to pollute the air I have
> > to breath, in any way. I shouldn't have to breath in or even
> > smell someones else's drug as I walk down the street.
>
> Public property was paid for by looting private individuals'
> pockets or appropriating it directly. The concept of regulating
> public activities is pure socialist bullshit. Ordinances
> prohibiting or regulating any activity on private property is part
> of our creeping nanny state totalitarianism.
You fucking dimwit -- public property was all there ever was. Private
property is purely a construct of Euro culture, at least in this hemisphere. Who
owned the whole fucking continent when the eurotrash expatriates hit the east
coast? You really think you *own* a piece of Mother Earth? Guess again when that
volcano erupts underneath it.
>
> Any individual who enforces, or any politician who votes for a law
> that uses force to regulate behavior is guilty of initiating force
> against anyone affected by the law, and is a deserving target of
> retaliation. Any individual who votes for one of these political
> scumbags or urges them to enact such a law is also a deserving
> target of retaliation.
>
Some people, like this dumbfuck, don't deserve to be sucking air. "using force
to regulate behavior" is wrong? Like if some shithead tries to rob me I can't
"regulate" their behavior? Or my village can't hire a professional
"regulator" to deal with robbers? Or for that matter, to "regulate" people who
smoke in public?
--
Harmon Seaver
CyberShamanix
http://www.cybershamanix.com
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list