Quarantines may be justified

Harmon Seaver hseaver at cybershamanix.com
Sat Apr 19 13:46:33 PDT 2003


On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 03:55:06PM -0400, david wrote:
> On Saturday 19 April 2003 10:02, Harmon Seaver  wrote:
> >
> >    Agreed, except for smoking in public. All smoking in public
> > should be banned. No one has the right to pollute the air I have
> > to breath, in any way. I shouldn't have to breath in or even
> > smell someones else's drug as I walk down the street.
> 
> Public property was paid for by looting private individuals' 
> pockets or appropriating it directly.  The concept of regulating 
> public activities is pure socialist bullshit.  Ordinances 
> prohibiting or regulating any activity on private property is part 
> of our creeping nanny state totalitarianism.  

   You fucking dimwit -- public property was all there ever was. Private
property is purely a construct of Euro culture, at least in this hemisphere. Who
owned the whole fucking continent when the eurotrash expatriates hit the east
coast? You really think you *own* a piece of Mother Earth? Guess again when that
volcano erupts underneath it. 


> 
> Any individual who enforces, or any politician who votes for a law 
> that uses force to regulate behavior is guilty of initiating force 
> against anyone affected by the law, and is a deserving target of 
> retaliation. Any individual who votes for one of these political 
> scumbags or urges them to enact such a law is also a deserving 
> target of retaliation.
> 

  Some people, like this dumbfuck, don't deserve to be sucking air. "using force
to regulate behavior" is wrong? Like if some shithead tries to rob me I can't 
"regulate" their behavior? Or my village can't hire a professional
"regulator" to deal with robbers? Or for that matter, to "regulate" people who
smoke in public? 
 

-- 
Harmon Seaver	
CyberShamanix
http://www.cybershamanix.com





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list