why bother signing? (was Re: What email encryption is actually in use?)
Ben Laurie
ben at algroup.co.uk
Sat Oct 5 04:34:01 PDT 2002
Ben Laurie wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:07:50PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>
>>At 04:45 PM 10/3/02 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
>>
>>> --
>>>James A. Donald wrote:
>>>
>>>>>If we had client side encryption that "just works" we would
>>>>>be seeing a few more signed messages on this list,
>>>>
>>>Ben Laurie wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why would I want to sign a message to this list?
>>>
>>>Then all the people who read this list, were they to receive a
>>>communication from you, they would know it was the same Ben
>>>Laurie who posts to this list.
>>
>>But Ben is not spoofed here!
>
>
>
> He is now.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
I will confirm this as a (detectable) spoof :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list