Who represents the detained? Nobody...

[cubic-dog]

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Anonymous wrote:

> >>>They HAVE representation, and I don't THINK the Bill
> >>>of Rights says anywhere that you get to see Mommy
> >>>if you're arrested, but that you can obtain
> >>>representation, you are not required to incriminate
> >>>yourself, and so forth.  In theory.
> >>
> >>Get a clue. The issue is not "get to see Mommy."
> >>
> >>Rather, the issue is the holding of 600+ various persons, some of whom are 
> >>very vaguely claimed to be "material witnesses."
> >
> >
> >Note too that many of the detained 
> >may not have lawyers.  


What does 
Ex parte milligan 
mean here?