CNN.com - A real!!! news story...

[Reese]

No Shit.

Jim, take your damned meds, get off the high horse, and SHADDUP.

Nice list of news outlets, Declan, maybe Jim would like to address the
obvious conspiratorial implications of Ted Turner insulting xtians by
asking if that was dirt on their foreheads, on Ash Wednesday.

Harrumph.

Reese

At 10:46 AM 3/29/01 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
 >On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
 >> Why does CNN have nothing on the 9th Circuit ruling related to 'free 
speech'
 >> expression of 'violent acts'? Is 'civil liberties' not a news worthy point?
 >> Is the abortion issue not important?
 >>
 >> http://www.cnn.com/
 >>
 >> And finally, why will 'independent media' outlets not point this irony out?
 >
 >
 >Yes, clearly the media is covering up this decision.
 >
 >-Declan
 >
 >Abortion 'Hit List' Protected, Court Says
 >Mar. 29, 2001 07:30 ET
 >www.sltrib.com/03292001/nation_w/83845.htm
 >
 >Anti-Abortion Verdict Overturned
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:53 ET
 >cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,282235-412,00.shtml
 >
 >Threats against abortion doctors protected, judges rule
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:53 ET
 >www.kcstar.com/item/pages/home.pat,local/37753cdb.328,.html
 >
 >Court: Web site attacking abortion doctors protected
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:51 ET
 >seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeattleTimes.woa/wa/gotoArticle
 >?zsection_id=268448413&t...
 >
 >Huge Verdict Voided / $107 million judgment against anti-abortion activists
 >dumped
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:50 ET
 >www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/28/MN6244
 >5.DTL
 >
 >Court upholds abortion doctor 'wanted list'
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:44 ET
 >www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/epaper/editions/today/news_a32c5d7664afd1
 >600051.html
 >
 >Appeals Court Backs Anti-Abortionists' Web Postings
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:35 ET
 >www.newsbytes.com/news/01/163787.html
 >
 >Appeals Court Overturns $109 Million Verdict Against Anti-Abortion Web Site
 >Mar. 29, 2001 05:05 ET
 >www.inside.com/jcs/Story?article
 >
 >Appeals court rules abortion foes' Web site is protected
 >Mar. 29, 2001 04:41 ET
 >inq.philly.com/content/inquirer/2001/03/29/national/ABOR29.htm
 >
 >Fed Appeals Court Sides with Abortion Activists
 >Mar. 28, 2001 23:10 ET
 >www.avn.com/ng/query.cgi?act=detail&in=news&eid=7921
 >
 >U.S. Court Tosses Major Anti-Abortion Verdict
 >Mar. 28, 2001 21:11 ET
 >dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/nm/20010328/pl/court_abortion_dc_1.html
 >
 >Anti-Abortion Site Wins Appeal
 >Mar. 28, 2001 20:55 ET
 >www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,42708,00.html
 >
 >Court: Abortion Threats Protected
 >Mar. 28, 2001 16:25 ET
 >abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/abortionappeal010328.html
 >(cached article)