CNN.com - A real!!! news story...

[Declan McCullagh]

Right. I spent a year with the CNN.com/AllPolitics folks, and it is
beyond inconceivable that they're not covering this decision for
political/etc. reasons. Sheesh.

-Declan


On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:42:21PM +0500, Reese wrote:
> No Shit.
> 
> Jim, take your damned meds, get off the high horse, and SHADDUP.
> 
> Nice list of news outlets, Declan, maybe Jim would like to address the
> obvious conspiratorial implications of Ted Turner insulting xtians by
> asking if that was dirt on their foreheads, on Ash Wednesday.
> 
> Harrumph.
> 
> Reese
> 
> At 10:46 AM 3/29/01 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>  >On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>  >> Why does CNN have nothing on the 9th Circuit ruling related to 'free 
> speech'
>  >> expression of 'violent acts'? Is 'civil liberties' not a news worthy point?
>  >> Is the abortion issue not important?
>  >>
>  >> http://www.cnn.com/
>  >>
>  >> And finally, why will 'independent media' outlets not point this irony out?
>  >
>  >
>  >Yes, clearly the media is covering up this decision.
>  >
>  >-Declan
>  >
>  >Abortion 'Hit List' Protected, Court Says
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 07:30 ET
>  >www.sltrib.com/03292001/nation_w/83845.htm
>  >
>  >Anti-Abortion Verdict Overturned
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:53 ET
>  >cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,282235-412,00.shtml
>  >
>  >Threats against abortion doctors protected, judges rule
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:53 ET
>  >www.kcstar.com/item/pages/home.pat,local/37753cdb.328,.html
>  >
>  >Court: Web site attacking abortion doctors protected
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:51 ET
>  >seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeattleTimes.woa/wa/gotoArticle
>  >?zsection_id=268448413&t...
>  >
>  >Huge Verdict Voided / $107 million judgment against anti-abortion activists
>  >dumped
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:50 ET
>  >www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/28/MN6244
>  >5.DTL
>  >
>  >Court upholds abortion doctor 'wanted list'
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:44 ET
>  >www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/epaper/editions/today/news_a32c5d7664afd1
>  >600051.html
>  >
>  >Appeals Court Backs Anti-Abortionists' Web Postings
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:35 ET
>  >www.newsbytes.com/news/01/163787.html
>  >
>  >Appeals Court Overturns $109 Million Verdict Against Anti-Abortion Web Site
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 05:05 ET
>  >www.inside.com/jcs/Story?article
>  >
>  >Appeals court rules abortion foes' Web site is protected
>  >Mar. 29, 2001 04:41 ET
>  >inq.philly.com/content/inquirer/2001/03/29/national/ABOR29.htm
>  >
>  >Fed Appeals Court Sides with Abortion Activists
>  >Mar. 28, 2001 23:10 ET
>  >www.avn.com/ng/query.cgi?act=detail&in=news&eid=7921
>  >
>  >U.S. Court Tosses Major Anti-Abortion Verdict
>  >Mar. 28, 2001 21:11 ET
>  >dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/nm/20010328/pl/court_abortion_dc_1.html
>  >
>  >Anti-Abortion Site Wins Appeal
>  >Mar. 28, 2001 20:55 ET
>  >www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,42708,00.html
>  >
>  >Court: Abortion Threats Protected
>  >Mar. 28, 2001 16:25 ET
>  >abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/abortionappeal010328.html
>  >(cached article) 
>