Microsoft Trial Judge Based His Break-Up "Remedy" On Flawed Theory, Not Facts

[Declan McCullagh]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:47:09PM -0800, Tim May wrote, quoting someone:
> >
> >But now, I am beginning to see what you are saying.  We shouldn't blame
> >*speech* for the result of speech.  It's the *result* of said speech that
> >should be the grounds of wrongness.  Makes sense to me.
> 
> If you are this easily persuaded, and come at "free speech" with such 
> confusion, you have a lot of reading ahead of you. I envy you, 
> actually.

Right. Put another way, the reason we care about free speech and
want to protect it is precisely *because* it has powerful results.

-Declan